Comparison of Toric Implantable Collamer Lens and Toric Artiflex Phakic IOLs in Terms of Visual Outcome: a Paired...

This study sought to compare the postoperative visual outcomes of toric implantable collamer lens (T-ICL) with toric Artiflex (T-Artiflex) lenses.

Alternating treatment, contralateral eye matched clinical study.

This study compared 82 eyes of 41 patients with T-ICL lenses in one eye and toric Artiflex implantation in the contralateral eye to correct myopic astigmatism. Safety, efficacy, predictability, astigmatic vector changes, contrast sensitivity, endothelial cell count, and possible adverse events were assessed at least 12 months postoperatively.

After a mean follow-up of 12 months, the safety index was mean 1.40 ± 0.70 in the T-ICL group and 1.20 ± 0.21 in the T-Artiflex group. Furthermore, their mean efficacy indexes were 1.24 ± 0.42 and 1.08 ± 0.23, respectively (P = .029). A total of 39 eyes (95%) in the T-ICL group and 41 eyes (100%) in the T-Artiflex group were within ±1.00 diopter (D) of emmetropia and 33 eyes (80%) and 34 eyes (83%) were within ±0.5 D of emmetropia, respectively. Vector analysis revealed mean index of success as large as 0.25 ± 0.22 in the T-ICL group and 0.24 ± 0.15 in the T-Artiflex group. Postoperative contrast sensitivities were equal in both groups under mesopic conditions for any given spatial frequency. There was an endothelial loss of 2.18% and 1.95% in the T-ICL and T-Artiflex groups, respectively. There were no significant complications in any of the groups.

Both lenses showed promising results in terms of safety, efficacy, and predictability for correction of myopic astigmatism. As shown in this paired-eye study, most outcomes were almost identical, and neither of these lenses were clinically superior to the other.