Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 16, 2025

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
Published on: March 23, 2022
Effectiveness of the use of implementation intentions on reduction of substance use: A meta-analysis
Amy Malaguti1, Oana Ciocanel2, Fabio Sani3
1School of Social Sciences (Psychology), University of Dundee, Scrymgeour Building, Park Place, Dundee, DD1 4HN, United Kingdom; Adult Psychological Therapies Service, NHS Tayside, 15 Dudhope Terrace, Dundee, DD3 6HH, United Kingdom; Sexual Health and Blood Borne Virus Managed Care Network, Public Health Directorate, NHS Tayside, Kings Cross Hospital, Dundee, DD3 8EA, United Kingdom.
Objective:
Background: Substance use, such as alcohol drinking, tobacco smoking and illicit drug use, have been associated with severe health conditions and an annual estimated 12 % of all deaths worldwide. Implementation intentions are self-regulatory processes which help achieve health-related behaviour change.
Objectives:
To investigate the effectiveness of forming implementation intentions to reduce substance use.
Design:
Data sources: PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Psychology and Behavioural Science Collection, clinicaltrials.gov, UK Clinical Trials Gateway, Reference lists.
Inclusion Criteria:
RCT of substance users forming implementation intentions to reduce consumption (active or passive control condition present).
Study Appraisal And Synthesis Methods:
the SIGN checklist for RCT quality was used for quality appraisal, data was extracted by two reviewers.
Results:
Twenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall effect size for alcohol use was g = 0.31 (95 % CI: 0.21, 0.42), p < .001; for tobacco smoking g = 0.31 (CI: 0.12, 0.5), p = .002; no studies were retrieved for the use of implementation intentions on illicit drug use.
Conclusion:
This review suggests that implementation intention interventions are effective in reducing some forms of substance use (alcohol use and tobacco smoking), albeit revealing small effect sizes, among the general population and students in secondary and higher education. Review registration number: CRD42018116170.
More Related Videos
09:29Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods
Published on: August 4, 2022
05:40The Motivation for Alcohol Reward: Predictors of Progressive-Ratio Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration in Humans
Published on: April 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Substance Use Disorders Affecting Sleep
Understanding the concepts of physical dependence,...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Drug Dependence
Self-Regulation