Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Controls in Experiments

Controls in Experiments

When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[Professional skepticism in medical research].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2026

Same author

Reporting Completeness of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Meta-Review of Investigations on Adherence to STARD 2015.

Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes·2026

Same author

Cost-effectiveness of time-lapse monitoring with or without the use of embryo selection software compared to routine incubation and selection.

Human reproduction open·2026

Same author

Reporting of D-dimer testing in venous thromboembolism diagnostic management studies: a scoping review.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2026

Same author

Frameworks of Health Outcomes for Performance Specifications in Laboratory Medicine.

Clinical chemistry·2026

Same author

The win ratio for evaluating edoxaban vs dalteparin for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: an analysis of the randomized Hokusai Venous Thromboembolism Cancer trial.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2025

Same journal

A comparison of five statistical methods used to analyse longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Many multicenter randomized controlled trials do not account for center effect: a methodological review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Patient Acceptability of the Modified Zelen Approach to Randomized Trials - A Survey of the CAPS THA Cohort.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Corrigendum to SPICE-GRADE: simultaneous processing of indirect causal evidence in complex pathways using GRADE - an exploratory case study. [Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 194C (2026) 112219].

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same journal

Small numbers of clusters in cluster randomised trials: a scoping review of problems and proposed solutions.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 16, 2025

Large-Scale SARS-CoV-2 Testing Utilizing Saliva and Transposition Sample Pooling

Large-Scale SARS-CoV-2 Testing Utilizing Saliva and Transposition Sample Pooling

Published on: June 23, 2022

Testing COVID-19 tests faces methodological challenges.

Patrick M Bossuyt¹

¹Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Room J1B-214, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

|July 6, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate COVID-19 testing is crucial. Rigorous evaluation of diagnostic tests, including viral RNA and antibody detection, faces challenges in methodology and participant recruitment, impacting performance assessment.

Keywords:

Analytical performance COVID-19 Clinical performance Diagnostic accuracy Medical tests SARS-CoV-2

More Related Videos

Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics

Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics

Published on: June 17, 2022

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19

Published on: February 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 16, 2025

Large-Scale SARS-CoV-2 Testing Utilizing Saliva and Transposition Sample Pooling

Large-Scale SARS-CoV-2 Testing Utilizing Saliva and Transposition Sample Pooling

Published on: June 23, 2022

Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics

Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics

Published on: June 17, 2022

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19

Published on: February 16, 2022

Area of Science:

Virology
Diagnostic Medicine
Epidemiology

Background:

Testing for COVID-19, including viral RNA and antibody detection, is vital for pandemic management.
Rigorous evaluation of diagnostic test performance is essential but presents significant challenges.
Methodological issues, including participant selection and lack of reference standards, complicate accuracy assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight the challenges in evaluating the analytical and clinical performance of COVID-19 diagnostic tests.
To identify generic and virus-specific methodological issues in diagnostic accuracy studies.
To address the limitations in summarizing test performance due to heterogeneity in false-negative result generation.

Main Methods:

Review of methodologies for evaluating diagnostic accuracy of viral tests.
Analysis of common pitfalls in study design, participant recruitment, and reporting.
Examination of factors contributing to heterogeneity in false-negative results for viral RNA tests.

Main Results:

Significant logistic and methodological challenges exist in evaluating COVID-19 tests.
Absence of an independent reference standard complicates clinical performance evaluation for viral RNA tests.
Inconsistent study rigor and insufficient reporting hinder the assessment of test applicability and performance.

Conclusions:

Current methods for evaluating COVID-19 diagnostic tests require improvement to address inherent methodological limitations.
Heterogeneity in false-negative results significantly impacts the reliability of summarized test performance metrics.
Enhanced rigor in study design, participant selection, and reporting is necessary for accurate diagnostic test evaluation.