Genome-wide comparison of Carnobacterium maltaromaticum derived from diseased fish harbouring important

HyeongJin Roh1, Bo Seong Kim2, Mu Kun Lee3

  • 1Department of Aquatic life medicine. College of Fisheries Science, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea.

Insights

Carnobacterium maltaromaticum strains from diseased fish are pathogenic to rainbow trout, unlike food-derived strains. These virulent strains possess unique genes, including wecC paralogs, linked to D-mannosaminuronic acid production and virulence.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Fish Pathology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Carnobacterium maltaromaticum, previously used as a fish probiotic, has been identified as a fish pathogen in Korea.
  • Understanding the genetic and pathogenic differences between C. maltaromaticum strains is crucial for fish health management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains of Carnobacterium maltaromaticum.
  • To identify genetic markers associated with the pathogenicity of C. maltaromaticum in fish.

Main Methods:

  • Pathogenicity testing of C. maltaromaticum strains (ATCC35586, 18ISCm, DSM20342) in rainbow trout.
  • Whole-genome sequencing and comparative genomic analysis of 25 C. maltaromaticum strains.
  • In vitro co-culture experiments with trout blood cells.

Main Results:

  • Strains isolated from diseased fish induced high mortality and severe histopathological changes in rainbow trout.
  • Pathogenic strains uniquely possessed wecC and xtmA genes, absent in food-derived strains.
  • Two wecC paralogs, involved in D-mannosaminuronic acid synthesis (a teichuronic acid component), were found in pathogenic strains and upregulated when co-cultured with trout blood cells.

Conclusions:

  • Carnobacterium maltaromaticum strains from diseased fish exhibit distinct pathogenic potential compared to food-derived strains.
  • The wecC gene and its paralogs are potential virulence factors in C. maltaromaticum pathogenicity in fish.
  • Genomic and pathogenic differences highlight the need for careful strain selection in aquaculture probiotics.