Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

05:59
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
Published on: March 7, 2019
7.0K
The occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ): a validation study with accelerometer-assessed
Iris Maes1, Margo Ketels2, Delfien Van Dyck1
1Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
BMC Public Health
|July 8, 2020
Summary
The Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) shows good validity for assessing sitting and standing at work. However, accelerometers are recommended for accurately measuring occupational walking and heavy labor.
Area of Science:
- Occupational health
- Physical activity measurement
- Workplace ergonomics
Background:
- The Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) is a self-report tool for assessing workplace physical activities.
- Evaluating the OSPAQ's concurrent validity against objective measures is crucial for its application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the concurrent validity of the OSPAQ against accelerometer data.
- To compare the OSPAQ's performance across sedentary and physically active professions.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the Flemish Employees' Physical Activity (FEPA) study.
- Collected questionnaire and accelerometer (Axivity AX3) data from 401 employees over at least two working days.
- Analyzed concurrent validity using Intraclass Correlation (ICC) and Spearman rho (r) correlations.
Main Results:
- OSPAQ demonstrated good to moderate concurrent validity for sitting (ICC=0.84, r=0.53) and standing (ICC=0.64, r=0.53).
- Concurrent validity was weak to moderate for walking (ICC=0.50, r=0.49) and weak for heavy labor (ICC=0.28, r=0.35).
- Validity varied by profession type, with underestimation of sitting/standing and overestimation of walking/heavy labor in physically active roles.
Conclusions:
- The OSPAQ is acceptable for measuring occupational sitting and standing.
- Accelerometer-based measures are recommended for assessing occupational walking and heavy labor due to poor concurrent validity.
- Further research may refine OSPAQ use or explore alternative objective measures.

