Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Detecting Somatic Genetic Alterations in Tumor Specimens by Exon Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing
Published on: October 18, 2013
Comparative analysis of somatic variant calling on matched FF and FFPE WGS samples
Louise de Schaetzen van Brienen1, Maarten Larmuseau1, Kim Van der Eecken2
1Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Department of Information Technology, IDLab, imec, iGent Toren, Ghent, Belgium.
Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) tumor samples can be used for whole genome cancer cohort studies. A new heuristic approach improves the recovery of somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) from FFPE samples, enhancing precision and sensitivity.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Cancer Research
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Fresh Frozen (FF) DNA is not routinely collected in clinical settings.
- Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) tumor samples are widely available.
- FFPE samples could significantly expand cancer cohort studies if artefacts are managed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility of using FFPE samples for whole genome cancer cohort studies.
- To compare somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) called from matching FF and FFPE samples.
- To develop and validate a variant calling strategy for FFPE material.
Main Methods:
- Somatic variants were called on matching FF and FFPE whole genome sequencing (WGS) samples using four callers (Strelka2, Mutect2, VarScan2, Shimmer).
- A heuristic approach was developed to maximize overlap (sensitivity and precision) between FF and FFPE variant calls.
- The approach was validated on nine additional matched samples and intra-tumor heterogeneity (ITH) was assessed.
Main Results:
- An average of 50% of somatic SNVs from FF samples were recovered in matching FFPE samples, with significant caller-dependent variation.
- The developed heuristic improved both precision and sensitivity, achieving an average F1-score of 0.58 across nine validation samples.
- A portion of the discrepancy between FF and FFPE samples was attributed to intra-tumor heterogeneity (ITH).
Conclusions:
- Somatic SNVs can be recovered from FFPE samples with high precision and sensitivity using an optimized variant calling strategy.
- FFPE-derived WGS data is suitable for large-scale cancer cohort studies.
- This approach maximizes the utility of archived clinical tumor samples for genomic research.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Sanger Sequencing

