External Validation of the Oakland Score to Assess Safe Hospital Discharge Among Adult Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the US
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
Kathryn Oakland1,2, Sandeepkumar Kothiwale3, Tyler Forehand3
1Department of Digestive Diseases, HCA Healthcare UK, London, United Kingdom.
Insights
The Oakland Score effectively identifies patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) suitable for outpatient care. Raising the threshold to 10 points or less allows more low-risk LGIB patients to avoid hospitalization.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Clinical Triage
- Prognostic Modeling
Background:
- Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a frequent cause for hospital admission, often resolving spontaneously.
- A validated risk score can optimize triage and facilitate outpatient management for LGIB patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To externally validate the prognostic accuracy of the Oakland Score for identifying low-risk LGIB patients.
- To assess the impact of adjusting the Oakland Score threshold on patient identification for safe discharge.
Main Methods:
- Multicenter external validation study involving 38,067 adult patients with LGIB across 140 US hospitals.
- Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis was used to evaluate the Oakland Score's performance.
- Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for score thresholds of ≤8, ≤9, and ≤10 points.
Main Results:
- The Oakland Score demonstrated strong predictive accuracy for safe discharge (AUROC = 0.87).
- A threshold of ≤8 identified 8.7% of patients with 98.4% sensitivity and 16.0% specificity.
- Extending the threshold to ≤10 identified 17.8% of patients with 96.0% sensitivity and 31.9% specificity.
Conclusions:
- The Oakland Score reliably identifies acute LGIB patients at low risk for adverse outcomes, enabling safe outpatient management.
- Increasing the Oakland Score threshold to ≤10 points allows for the identification of a larger proportion of low-risk patients, potentially reducing hospitalizations.
Importance:
Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB), which manifests as blood in the colon or anorectum, is a common reason for hospitalization. In most patients, LGIB stops spontaneously with no in-hospital intervention. A risk score that could identify patients at low risk of experiencing adverse outcomes could help improve the triage process and allow greater numbers of patients to receive outpatient management of LGIB.
Objective:
To externally validate the Oakland Score, which was previously developed using a score threshold of 8 points to identify patients with LGIB who are at low risk of adverse outcomes.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This multicenter prognostic study was conducted in 140 US hospitals in the Hospital Corporation of America network. A total of 46 179 adult patients (aged ≥16 years) admitted to the hospital with a primary diagnosis of LGIB between June 1, 2016, and October 15, 2018, were initially identified using diagnostic codes. Of those, 51 patients were excluded because they were more likely to have upper gastrointestinal bleeding, leaving a study population of 46 128 patients with LGIB. For the statistical analysis of the Oakland Score, an additional 8061 patients were excluded because they were missing data on Oakland Score components or clinical outcomes, resulting in 38 067 patients included in the analysis. The study used area under the receiver operating characteristic curves with 95% CIs for external validation of the model. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each score threshold (≤8 points, ≤9 points, and ≤10 points). Data were analyzed from October 16, 2018, to September 4, 2019.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Identification of patients who met the criteria for safe discharge from the hospital and comparison of the performance of 2 score thresholds (≤8 points vs ≤10 points). Safe discharge was defined as the absence of blood transfusion, rebleeding, hemostatic intervention, hospital readmission, and death.
Results:
Among 46 128 adult patients with LGIB, the mean (SD) age was 70.1 (16.5) years; 23 091 patients (50.1%) were female. Of those, 22 074 patients (47.9%) met the criteria for safe discharge from the hospital. In this group, the mean (SD) age was 67.9 (18.1) years, and 11 056 patients (50.1%) were female. In the statistical analysis of the Oakland Score, which included only the 38 067 patients with complete data, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for safe discharge was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.87-0.87). An Oakland Score threshold of 8 points or lower identified 3305 patients (8.7%), with a sensitivity and specificity for safe discharge of 98.4% and 16.0%, respectively. Extension of the Oakland Score threshold to 10 points or lower identified 6770 patients (17.8%), with a sensitivity and specificity for safe discharge of 96.0% and 31.9%, respectively.
Conclusions And Relevance:
In this study, the Oakland Score consistently identified patients with acute LGIB who were at low risk of experiencing adverse outcomes and whose conditions could safely be managed without hospitalization. The score threshold to identify low-risk patients could be extended from 8 points or lower to 10 points or lower to allow identification of a greater proportion of low-risk patients.
Related Concept Videos
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Discharge Summary Forms
Here's a detailed look at the key components and guidelines for preparing a discharge summary:
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
