Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Isolation and Cultivation of Neural Progenitors Followed by Chromatin-Immunoprecipitation of Histone 3 Lysine 79 Dimethylation Mark
Published on: January 26, 2018
Specific patterns of H3K79 methylation influence genetic interaction of oncogenes in AML
Molly C Kingsley1,2, Hongbo M Xie3, Bo-Rui Chen4
1Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Bone Marrow Transplant, University of Colorado School of Medicine-Children's Hospital Colorado Aurora, CO.
Abstract:
Understanding mechanisms of cooperation between oncogenes is critical for the development of novel therapies and rational combinations. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells with KMT2A-fusions and KMT2A partial tandem duplications (KMT2APTD) are known to depend on the histone methyltransferase DOT1L, which methylates histone 3 lysine 79 (H3K79). About 30% of KMT2APTD AMLs carry mutations in IDH1/2 (mIDH1/2). Previous studies showed that 2-hydroxyglutarate produced by mIDH1/2 increases H3K79 methylation, and mIDH1/2 patient samples are sensitive to DOT1L inhibition. Together, these findings suggested that stabilization or increases in H3K79 methylation associated with IDH mutations support the proliferation of leukemias dependent on this mark. However, we found that mIDH1/2 and KMT2A alterations failed to cooperate in an experimental model. Instead, mIDH1/2 and 2-hydroxyglutarate exert toxic effects, specifically on KMT2A-rearranged AML cells (fusions/partial tandem duplications). Mechanistically, we uncover an epigenetic barrier to efficient cooperation; mIDH1/2 expression is associated with high global histone 3 lysine 79 dimethylation (H3K79me2) levels, whereas global H3K79me2 is obligate low in KMT2A-rearranged AML. Increasing H3K79me2 levels, specifically in KMT2A-rearrangement leukemias, resulted in transcriptional downregulation of KMT2A target genes and impaired leukemia cell growth. Our study details a complex genetic and epigenetic interaction of 2 classes of oncogenes, IDH1/2 mutations and KMT2A rearrangements, that is unexpected based on the high percentage of IDH mutations in KMT2APTD AML. KMT2A rearrangements are associated with a trend toward lower response rates to mIDH1/2 inhibitors. The substantial adaptation that has to occur for 2 initially counteracting mutations to be tolerated within the same leukemic cell may provide at least a partial explanation for this observation.
Insights
Mutant IDH1/2 and KMT2A alterations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) do not cooperate as expected. Instead, mutant IDH1/2 causes toxicity in KMT2A-rearranged AML by increasing H3K79me2, impairing leukemia cell growth.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Cancer Biology
- Epigenetics
Background:
- Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with KMT2A alterations and mutant IDH1/2 (mIDH1/2) are common oncogenic drivers.
- KMT2A-rearranged AML depends on DOT1L for H3K79 methylation, and mIDH1/2 produces 2-hydroxyglutarate, which can increase H3K79 methylation.
- Previous findings suggested cooperation between mIDH1/2 and KMT2A alterations, predicting sensitivity to DOT1L inhibition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the cooperative mechanisms between KMT2A alterations and mIDH1/2 in AML.
- To elucidate the epigenetic interactions governing the co-occurrence of these mutations in leukemia.
Main Methods:
- Utilized experimental models to assess the interaction between mIDH1/2 and KMT2A alterations.
- Analyzed global histone 3 lysine 79 dimethylation (H3K79me2) levels in different AML contexts.
- Investigated the impact of modulating H3K79me2 levels on KMT2A target gene expression and leukemia cell growth.
Main Results:
- Contrary to expectations, mIDH1/2 and KMT2A alterations failed to cooperate and instead exhibited toxicity towards KMT2A-rearranged AML cells.
- An epigenetic barrier was identified: mIDH1/2 expression leads to high global H3K79me2, while KMT2A-rearranged AML requires low global H3K79me2.
- Increasing H3K79me2 in KMT2A-rearranged AML downregulated oncogenic targets and inhibited leukemia cell proliferation.
Conclusions:
- The interaction between mIDH1/2 and KMT2A rearrangements is complex and counterintuitive, involving an epigenetic antagonism.
- High H3K79me2 induced by mIDH1/2 acts as a barrier, explaining the lack of cooperation and potential reduced sensitivity to mIDH1/2 inhibitors in KMT2A-rearranged AML.
- Understanding these adaptations is crucial for developing targeted therapies for AML subtypes with combined oncogenic drivers.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Epigenetic Regulation
X-chromosome...
Epigenetic Regulation
Abnormal Proliferation
Histone Modification
Acetylation
The enzyme histone acetyltransferase adds acetyl group to the histones. Another enzyme, histone...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Inheritance of Chromatin Structures

