Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Inducing Apical Periodontitis in Mice
Published on: August 6, 2019
[Interaction analysis between epidermal growth factor and peroxidase proliferators activate receptor-α gene
1Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.
Abstract:
Objective: To explore the correlation and interaction between epidermal growth factor (EGF) rs2237051 and peroxidase proliferators activate receptor-α (PPAR-α) rs4253623 polymorphisms and the susceptibility of generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAgP). Methods: Two hundred and nineteen Chinese patients with GAgP were enrolled from the patients of the Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from January 2001 to December 2015. The control group comprised 138 periodontally healthy volunteers recruited from the staff and students of the Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology. The EGF rs2237051 and PPAR-α rs4253623 polymorphisms were genotyped using time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Logistic regression models were conducted to analyze the correlation between the EGF rs2237051 and PPAR-α rs4253623 variants with GAgP. The likelihood ratio test was used to analyze whether there was an interaction between the two polymorphisms in the susceptibility of GAgP. The interaction model adopted was the multiplication model. Results: The mean ages of GAgP group (male:87; female:132) and control group (male: 53; female: 85) were (27.3±4.5) years and (27.1±4.2) years respectively and there was no significant difference in age and gender distribution between the two groups. For EGF rs2237051, the frequency of AA genotype in the GAgP group [49.5% (107/216)] was significantly higher than that in the control group [37.7% (52/138)], and the frequency of AG/GG genotype in the GAgP group [50.5% (109/216)] was significantly lower than that in the control group [62.3% (86/138)](P<0.05). Compared with AA genotype, individuals with AG/GG genotype had a 39% lower risk of GAgP after adjustment of age and gender (OR: 0.61, 95%CI: 0.40-0.95, P<0.05). For PPAR-α rs4253623, the frequency of AA genotype in the GAgP group [76.2% (160/210)] was significantly higher than that in the control group [65.9%(81/123)], and the frequency of AG/GG genotype in the GAgP group [23.8% (50/210)] was significantly lower than that in the control group [34.1%(42/123)] (P<0.05). Compared with AA genotype, individuals with AG/GG genotype had a 40% lower risk of GAgP after adjustment of age and gender (OR: 0.60, 95%CI: 0.36-0.98, P<0.05). EGF rs2237051 and PPAR-α rs4253623 showed a significant interaction in the susceptibility to GAgP. Compared with AA genotype, the risk of GAgP in individuals with both AG/GG genotypes of EGF rs2237051 and PPAR-α rs4253623 was reduced by 66% (OR: 0.34, 95%CI: 0.17-0.66, P<0.01). Conclusions: EGF rs2237051 and PPAR-α rs4253623 are correlated with GAgP susceptibility, and there is a significant interaction between them in the susceptibility of GAgP. The G allele of the two loci has a protective effect on the disease of GAgP.
More Related Videos
11:15In Situ Detection of Bacteria within Paraffin-embedded Tissues Using a Digoxin-labeled DNA Probe Targeting 16S rRNA
Published on: May 21, 2015
12:16Porphyromonas gingivalis as a Model Organism for Assessing Interaction of Anaerobic Bacteria with Host Cells
Published on: December 17, 2015