Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Surgical Technique for the Implantation of Tissue Engineered Vascular Grafts and Subsequent In Vivo Monitoring
Published on: April 3, 2015
A Non-Interventional Study Documenting Use and Success of Tissue Level Implants
Carmen María Díaz-Castro1, Pedro Lázaro Calvo1, Francisco Javier Gil2
1Department of Periodontics and Dental Implants, University of Seville, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.
This study shows that dental implants placed in daily practice achieve high success and survival rates, comparable to controlled clinical trials. Patient satisfaction remains high after two years, demonstrating the reliability of implants in real-world scenarios.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Oral Implantology
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on dental implants often use strict criteria, potentially limiting generalizability to daily practice.
- Understanding implant behavior in routine clinical settings is crucial for evidence-based dentistry.
Purpose of the Study:
- To document the performance and outcomes of screw-shaped, tissue-level dental implants in a non-interventionist, multicentric trial reflecting daily practice.
- To evaluate implant success, survival rates, stability, crestal bone changes, and patient satisfaction over two years.
- To compare implant outcomes in daily practice versus controlled study conditions.
Main Methods:
- A multicentric, non-interventionist trial involving 196 screw-shaped, tissue-level implants.
- Clinicians selected implant type, surgical, loading, and prosthetic protocols without predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria.
- Data collection included implant parameters at surgery, implant stability quotient (ISQ), crestal bone level changes, and patient satisfaction up to two years post-placement.
Main Results:
- High success rate (98.31%) and survival rate (98.79%) were observed.
- Implant stability quotient (ISQ) increased from 68.61 ± 10.35 at surgery to 74.39 ± 9.64 at 2 years.
- Mean crestal bone loss was observed, with mesial distances changing from 1.25 mm to 2.04 mm and distal from 1.68 mm to 2.16 mm over two years.
- High patient satisfaction (69.3%) was reported at the 2-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Dental implants demonstrate high success and survival rates when used under standard, non-interventionist daily practice conditions.
- Implant stability and bone levels show predictable changes over two years, consistent with findings in controlled studies.
- The outcomes suggest that implants are a reliable treatment option in routine dental practice, achieving results comparable to those in highly controlled research settings.
More Related Videos
12:19Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
Published on: July 1, 2013
07:50Utilization of Ultrasound Guided Tissue-directed Cellular Implantation for the Establishment of Biologically Relevant Metastatic Tumor Xenografts
Published on: May 25, 2018