Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

miR-146a Mimic Therapy Protects Against Platelet-Mediated Thrombosis.

Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy·2026
Same author

Optimisation of osteosarcoma sample processing for epigenetic analysis: A comparative evaluation of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples with and without decalcification versus fresh tissue.

Revista espanola de patologia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Anatomia Patologica y de la Sociedad Espanola de Citologia·2026
Same author

Citizens' perceptions of the Chilean social outburst: environmental collective action willingness and the role of political identification, democracy, and gender.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Nocturnal Oxygen in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Advances in respiratory medicine·2026
Same author

SIR-2.3/SIRT4 loss enhances proteostasis and neuronal resilience via AMPK-induced autophagy in Huntington's disease models.

Cell communication and signaling : CCS·2026
Same author

Genome-wide methylation analysis of circulating cell-free DNA identifies an episignature in lung cancer: validation of EMP2 as a potential biomarker.

Clinical epigenetics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 15, 2025

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis
12:34

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

106.1K

Methods for analysis of specific DNA methylation status.

María J Pajares1, Cora Palanca-Ballester2, Raquel Urtasun3

  • 1Biochemistry Area, Department of Health Science, Public University of Navarre, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; IDISNA Navarra's Health Research Institute, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.

Methods (San Diego, Calif.)
|July 9, 2020
PubMed
Summary

DNA methylation patterns are key to gene regulation and disease development. This review details methods for analyzing specific DNA methylation, aiding disease diagnosis and understanding molecular mechanisms.

Keywords:
Bisulfite conversionCpG islandsDNA methylationDigital PCREpigeneticsLocus specific analysesTarget region

More Related Videos

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

37.8K
Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer
07:50

Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer

Published on: September 18, 2020

5.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 15, 2025

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis
12:34

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

106.1K
Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

37.8K
Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer
07:50

Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer

Published on: September 18, 2020

5.9K

Area of Science:

  • Epigenetics and Molecular Biology
  • Genomics and Bioinformatics

Background:

  • CpG dinucleotide methylation is critical for gene expression regulation.
  • Aberrant DNA methylation is linked to numerous diseases, including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders.
  • Analyzing DNA methylation patterns is vital for understanding disease mechanisms and developing biomarkers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review common methods for evaluating specific DNA methylation.
  • To provide a framework for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of different techniques.
  • To highlight the importance of locus-specific methylation analysis for validation and diagnosis.

Main Methods:

  • Bisulfite conversion-based methods: distinguish methylated from unmethylated DNA by deaminating unmethylated cytosines to uracil.
  • Restriction enzyme-based approaches: utilize enzymes that cleave unmethylated DNA, leaving methylated DNA intact.
  • Affinity enrichment-based assays: employ proteins or antibodies that bind to methylated DNA.

Main Results:

  • Three primary categories of techniques exist for identifying differentially methylated regions.
  • Each method group (bisulfite, restriction enzyme, affinity enrichment) has distinct theoretical underpinnings and applications.
  • A comprehensive analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach is presented.

Conclusions:

  • Specific DNA methylation analysis is essential for disease biomarker development and clinical management.
  • Understanding the nuances of various DNA methylation detection techniques is crucial for accurate research and diagnostics.
  • This review offers a guide to selecting appropriate methods for specific DNA methylation evaluation.