Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
Blood pressure variability within a single visit and all-cause mortality
T G Papaioannou1, G Georgiopoulos, K S Stamatelopoulos
1First Department of Cardiology, Biomedical Engineering Unit, Hippokration Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Insights
Blood pressure variability during a single visit, specifically diastolic blood pressure standard deviation, independently predicts mortality risk. This finding offers a new way to identify high-risk patients beyond average blood pressure readings.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Within-visit blood pressure (BP) variability impacts measurement precision and hypertension management.
- Limited data exist on the predictive ability of within-visit BP variability for clinical outcomes.
- Understanding BP variability is crucial for accurate risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between the variability of three repeated office BP measurements and the risk of all-cause mortality.
- To determine if BP variability predicts mortality independently of mean BP levels.
- To identify specific BP variability indices with prognostic value.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).
- Inclusion of 24,969 individuals with complete BP measurements and survival status.
- Utilized multivariable logistic regression to assess prognostic ability of demographic, clinical, and hemodynamic indices.
Main Results:
- The standard deviation of diastolic blood pressure (DBPSD) emerged as a stronger independent predictor of mortality.
- DBPSD showed a significant association with mortality (OR 1.064, 95% CI: 1.011-1.12) after comprehensive adjustments.
- This predictive ability was observed independent of systolic BP, age, sex, BMI, and other cardiovascular risk factors.
Conclusions:
- Within-visit variability of sequential diastolic BP readings can identify high-risk patients more effectively than mean BP levels.
- The prognostic value of within-visit BP variability warrants further investigation.
- Research into methods to enhance the clinical application of BP variability is recommended.
Background:
Within-visit variability of repeated sequential readings of blood pressure (BP) is an important phenomenon that may affect precision of BP measurement and thus decision making concerning BP-related risk and hypertension management. However, limited data exist concerning predictive ability of within-visit BP variability for clinical outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between the variability of three repeated office BP measurements and the risk of all-cause mortality, independent of BP levels.
Methods:
Data collected through the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analysed. NHANES is a program of studies designed to assess health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States. A complete set of three sequential BP measurements, together with survival status, were available for 24969 individuals (age 46.8±;19.3 years, 49% males). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the prognostic ability of the examined demographic, clinical, and haemodynamic indices.
Results:
Among various examined indices of variability of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure measurements, the standard deviation of DBP (DBPSD) was the stronger independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio 1.064, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.011-1.12) after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, SBP, heart rate, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia, and cardiovascular events.
Conclusion:
Within-visit variability of three sequential office DBP readings may allow for the identification of high-risk patients better than mean SBP and DBP levels. The predictive value of within-visit BP variability and methods to improve its clinical application are worthy of further research.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
09:18Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
Published on: December 15, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors: