Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Insertion of Single-pass Transmembrane Proteins in the RER01:26

Insertion of Single-pass Transmembrane Proteins in the RER

15.9K
Integral membrane proteins are proteins adhered to the lipid bilayer of a cell organelle or membrane. They can be of two types: transmembrane integral proteins that span the lipid bilayer and monotopic proteins that are attached to either side of the membrane but do not pass through it.
Integral transmembrane proteins possess transmembrane and extra membrane domains. The transmembrane domains are primarily made of 20-25 hydrophobic amino acids arranged in a helical secondary confirmation. These...
15.9K
Introduction to Membrane Proteins01:16

Introduction to Membrane Proteins

79.5K
The cell membrane, or plasma membrane, is an ever-changing landscape. It is described as a fluid mosaic where various macromolecules are embedded in the phospholipid bilayer. Among the macromolecules are proteins. The protein content varies across cell types. For example, mitochondrial inner membranes contain ~76% protein content, while myelin contains ~18% protein content. Individual cells contain many types of membrane proteins—red blood cells contain over 50—and different cell...
79.5K
Single-pass Transmembrane Proteins01:25

Single-pass Transmembrane Proteins

6.2K
Integral membrane proteins are tightly associated with the cell membrane and play a crucial role in cell communication, signaling, adhesion, and transport of the molecules. Some integral membrane proteins are present only in the membrane monolayer. For example, the enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase is present in the cytoplasmic side of the membrane monolayer. In contrast, another type of integral membrane protein, also known as a transmembrane protein, spans across the membrane. Transmembrane...
6.2K
Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins and β-barrels01:09

Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins and β-barrels

6.3K
In multi-pass transmembrane proteins, the polypeptide chain crosses the membrane more than once. The transmembrane polypeptide chain either forms an α-helix or β-strand structure. α-Helix containing multi-pass transmembrane proteins are ubiquitous, whereas β-strand containing ones are mainly found in gram-negative bacteria, mitochondria, and chloroplasts.
α-Helix containing multi-pass transmembrane proteins
Multi-pass transmembrane proteins such as...
6.3K
Protein Transport into the Inner Mitochondrial Membrane01:34

Protein Transport into the Inner Mitochondrial Membrane

4.6K
Nuclear encoded mitochondrial precursors are imported to the inner membrane in a multistep process involving two separate translocons, TIM22 and TIM23. TIM23 is a cation-selective pore that remains closed by the N terminal segment of the protein. Negative charges on the TIM23 act as a receptor for the incoming precursor, pulling the positively charged matrix-targeting sequence for peptide insertion and translocation.
Transport of mitochondrial precursors across the TIM23 channel is driven by...
4.6K
Insertion of Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins in the RER01:29

Insertion of Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins in the RER

17.0K
The rough ER membrane synthesizes, assembles, and embeds transmembrane proteins in diverse topologies. These proteins function as transporters or channels and can remain in the ER membrane or are sent to the Golgi complex, lysosome, and cell membrane.
The multipass transmembrane proteins are the type IV integral membrane proteins with multiple topogenic sequences determining their spatial arrangement in the ER membrane. Nearly all multipass proteins lack a cleavable signal sequence and use...
17.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Peptonics: Shear protection and foam prevention in mammalian cell cultures producing monoclonal antibodies and viral vectors for gene therapy.

Journal of biotechnology·2026
Same author

Challenges and Opportunities in Lentivirus Viral Vector Manufacturing for In Vivo Applications.

Biomedicines·2026
Same author

Conjugated Oligoelectrolytes as Optical Probes.

Accounts of chemical research·2026
Same author

Spontaneously N-Doped Conjugated Polyelectrolyte Coatings Accelerate Electron Uptake in Shewanella Oneidensis.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
Same author

Adaptive Machine Learning Framework for Optimizing the Affinity Purification of Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors.

Biotechnology and bioengineering·2026
Same author

Integrating the affinity and anion-exchange purification of AAV8: how the selective enrichment of full capsids at the affinity capture step enhances the downstream processing of gene therapies.

Journal of chromatography. A·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Native Cell Membrane Nanoparticles System for Membrane Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis
07:31

Native Cell Membrane Nanoparticles System for Membrane Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis

Published on: July 16, 2020

6.4K

Membrane Protein Insertion into and Compatibility with Biomimetic Membranes.

Tingwei Ren1, Mustafa Erbakan1,2, Yuexiao Shen1

  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Advanced Biosystems
|July 11, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New methods quantify biomimetic membrane compatibility, revealing protein activity is preserved but density varies. Hydrophobicity mismatch impacts protein insertion efficiency in these advanced materials.

Keywords:
amphiphilic block copolymersbiomimetic membranesfluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS)hydrophobicity mismatchmembrane proteins

More Related Videos

Assembly of Cell Mimicking Supported and Suspended Lipid Bilayer Models for the Study of Molecular Interactions
12:18

Assembly of Cell Mimicking Supported and Suspended Lipid Bilayer Models for the Study of Molecular Interactions

Published on: August 3, 2021

3.9K
A Model Membrane Platform for Reconstituting Mitochondrial Membrane Dynamics
10:31

A Model Membrane Platform for Reconstituting Mitochondrial Membrane Dynamics

Published on: September 2, 2020

7.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Native Cell Membrane Nanoparticles System for Membrane Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis
07:31

Native Cell Membrane Nanoparticles System for Membrane Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis

Published on: July 16, 2020

6.4K
Assembly of Cell Mimicking Supported and Suspended Lipid Bilayer Models for the Study of Molecular Interactions
12:18

Assembly of Cell Mimicking Supported and Suspended Lipid Bilayer Models for the Study of Molecular Interactions

Published on: August 3, 2021

3.9K
A Model Membrane Platform for Reconstituting Mitochondrial Membrane Dynamics
10:31

A Model Membrane Platform for Reconstituting Mitochondrial Membrane Dynamics

Published on: September 2, 2020

7.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Membrane Biophysics
  • Protein Engineering

Background:

  • Biomimetic membranes, functionalized with membrane proteins or mimics, are crucial for applications like drug screening, DNA sequencing, and bioelectronics.
  • Material performance in these applications critically depends on protein activity and packing density within bilayer structures.
  • Current tools for studying biomimetic membrane properties, such as protein compatibility, are insufficient.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present novel methods for evaluating membrane protein compatibility with biomimetic membrane materials.
  • To provide experimentally quantifiable measures of chemical and physical compatibility between proteins/mimics and membrane matrices.
  • To assess the performance of current biomimetic membrane materials using these new evaluation methods.

Main Methods:

  • Reconstitution of water transport proteins, rhodopsins, and artificial water channels into various biomimetic membrane matrices.
  • Development and application of methods to measure average single protein activity.
  • Quantification of protein packing density and assessment of chemical/physical compatibility factors.

Main Results:

  • Biological and artificial water channels largely maintained their single-protein water transport rates in biomimetic membranes.
  • Protein reconstitution density varied significantly across different membrane matrices, impacting overall membrane permeability.
  • Membrane protein insertion efficiency showed an inverse correlation with hydrophobicity mismatch (chemical and physical) between the protein and the membrane matrix.

Conclusions:

  • The developed methods enable accurate evaluation of biomimetic membrane properties, specifically protein compatibility.
  • Biomimetic membrane materials can support high protein activity, but optimizing protein density is key for performance.
  • Minimizing hydrophobicity mismatch is crucial for efficient membrane protein insertion and improved biomimetic membrane design.