Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Upper Blue Nile Basin Water Budget from a Multi-Model Perspective.
Hahn Chul Jung1,2, Augusto Getirana1,3, Frederick Policelli1
1Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.
Accurate Blue Nile water balance modeling is crucial for predicting hydroclimatic extremes. The Catchment Land Surface Model (CLSMF2.5) with the Hydrological Modeling and Analysis Platform (HyMAP) routing scheme offers improved hydrological estimates compared to Noah3.3.
Area of Science:
- Hydrology
- Climate Science
- Environmental Modeling
Background:
- Understanding the Blue Nile's water balance is critical due to increasing hydroclimatic extremes.
- Land surface models (LSMs) and various datasets are used to estimate water budget variables.
- Intercomparison of LSMs with different forcings and precipitation data can refine hydrological estimates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare two LSMs, Noah3.3 and CLSMF2.5, coupled with the HyMAP river routing scheme.
- To assess the impact of different meteorological forcing and precipitation datasets on hydrological estimates in the Blue Nile region.
- To identify the most suitable modeling approach for improving water balance representation.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Noah3.3 and CLSMF2.5 LSMs, coupled with the HyMAP river routing scheme.
- Forced models with combinations of MERRA-Land, MERRA-2 meteorological datasets, and CHIRPS, TRMM, MERRA precipitation datasets (16 experiments total).
- Evaluated modeled evapotranspiration (ET), streamflow, and terrestrial water storage against ALEXI, in-situ data, and GRACE products.
Main Results:
- CLSMF2.5 demonstrated superior performance over Noah3.3 in representing water budget variables, indicated by higher Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients.
- Model experiments using observation-based precipitation datasets (CHIRPS, TRMM) yielded better results than those using MERRA-Land and MERRA-2 precipitation.
- CLSMF2.5 coupled with HyMAP showed a better representation of Blue Nile water balance variables.
Conclusions:
- The Catchment LSM version Fortuna 2.5 (CLSMF2.5) coupled with the Hydrological Modeling and Analysis Platform (HyMAP) routing scheme is recommended for improved water balance modeling in the Blue Nile.
- Observation-based precipitation datasets (CHIRPS, TRMM) are more reliable for hydrological modeling in this region than reanalysis precipitation.
- Findings suggest incorporating CLSMF2.5 and HyMAP into systems like the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) Land Data Assimilation System for enhanced regional water management.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
Typical Model Studies
Modeling and Similitude
The Water Cycle
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Body Water Content and Fluid Compartments

