Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to Cognitive Psychology01:20

Introduction to Cognitive Psychology

2.0K
Cognitive psychology is the field of psychology dedicated to examining how people think. It attempts to explain how and why we think the way we do by studying the interactions among human thinking, emotion, creativity, language, and problem-solving, as well as other cognitive processes. Cognitive psychology studies how information is processed and manipulated in remembering, thinking, and knowing.
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...
2.0K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

15.2K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.2K
Cognitivism01:17

Cognitivism

2.5K
Cognitive psychology emerged as a significant field in the mid-20th century. It focused on understanding humans' internal mental processes. This approach emphasizes how people perceive, remember, think, and solve problems—elements critical to human cognition.
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
2.5K
Cognition and Behavior01:23

Cognition and Behavior

237
Social psychology examines the complex interplay between individual mental processes and social interactions. Historically, the field was divided into two domains: social behavior and social cognition. Researchers focusing on social behavior analyzed actions within social contexts, such as conformity, aggression, or cooperation. Meanwhile, social cognition researchers investigated how people perceive, interpret, and mentally represent their social environments. However, modern perspectives no...
237
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

159
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
159
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality01:30

Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality

873
Social cognitive perspectives on personality emphasize the importance of conscious awareness, beliefs, expectations, and goals in shaping behavior. These perspectives incorporate behaviorist principles, such as learning through reinforcement and conditioning, but extend beyond them by highlighting human reasoning and planning. Unlike traditional behaviorist views, social cognitive theory focuses on how individuals reflect on their past experiences and plan for future outcomes by considering...
873

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Which side do you take? Instruction versus action in resolving frame of reference conflicts.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Perspective Taking and Avatar-Self Merging.

Frontiers in psychology·2022
Same author

Character Customization With Cosmetic Microtransactions in Games: Subjective Experience and Objective Performance.

Frontiers in psychology·2022
Same author

Object affordances from the perspective of an avatar.

Consciousness and cognition·2021
Same author

Is effector visibility critical for performance asymmetries in the Simon task? Evidence from hand- and foot-press responses.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2020
Same author

Seeing the world through the eyes of an avatar? Comparing perspective taking and referential coding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.2K

Human Cognition in Interaction With Robots: Taking the Robot's Perspective Into Account.

Sophia von Salm-Hoogstraeten1, Jochen Müsseler1

  • 19165 RWTH Aachen University, Germany.

Human Factors
|July 11, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Human-robot interaction in shared workspaces changes stimulus-response (SR) relationships. Taking the robot's perspective impacts cognitive processing, affecting response times and errors.

Keywords:
Simon effecthuman–robot collaborationhuman–robot interactionstimulus–response compatibility

More Related Videos

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
11:01

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots

Published on: November 24, 2015

13.6K
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

5.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

8.2K
SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
11:01

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots

Published on: November 24, 2015

13.6K
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

5.0K

Area of Science:

  • Human-robot interaction
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Modern workplaces increasingly integrate advanced robots, necessitating an understanding of their impact on human cognition.
  • Physical proximity in human-robot collaboration requires investigating how robots influence human cognitive processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how different human-robot interaction types in a shared workspace affect human stimulus-response (SR) relationships.
  • To determine the cognitive extent to which participants adopt the robot's perspective during interaction.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted comparing remote control and monitoring conditions in a shared workspace.
  • A stimulus-response (SR) compatibility task was used to evaluate the cognitive perspective-taking of participants.

Main Results:

  • Pronounced SR compatibility effects were observed when participants adopted the robot's perspective.
  • Significantly reduced compatibility effects occurred when human and robot did not interact.
  • Compatibility effects from the robot's perspective led to significant differences in response times and error rates.

Conclusions:

  • SR relationships are altered in shared human-robot workspaces, particularly when users must adopt the robot's perspective.
  • Design considerations for shared workspaces should account for robot-perspective-taking to optimize performance and safety.