Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Multimarker approach including CRP, sST2 and GDF-15 for prognostic stratification in stable heart failure
Nils Kuster1,2, Fabien Huet3,2, Anne-Marie Dupuy1
1Department of Biochemistry, Centre Ressources Biologiques de Montpellier, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Insights
Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) improve heart failure (HF) prognosis. GDF-15 offers sustained value, predicting middle-term mortality in HF patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomarkers
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Inflammation and cardiac remodelling are key in heart failure (HF).
- Emerging biomarkers like soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) are linked to inflammation and fibrosis.
- Their combined prognostic value in HF requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate inflammatory and remodelling biomarkers for predicting mortality in chronic HF patients.
- To compare novel biomarkers (sST2, GDF-15) with established markers (NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, CRP) and risk scores.
- To assess the additive prognostic value of sST2 and GDF-15 in HF.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a cohort of 182 chronic HF patients followed for 80 months.
- Evaluation of sST2, GDF-15, NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, and C-reactive protein (CRP).
- Univariate and multivariate analyses, including adjustment for the meta-analysis global group in chronic HF score, with split follow-up periods (short, mid, long-term).
Main Results:
- Univariate analysis: CRP and sST2 predicted short-term mortality; GDF-15 predicted short and mid-term mortality.
- Multivariate analysis: sST2 predicted short-term mortality (P=0.0225); GDF-15 predicted mid-term mortality (P=0.0375).
- No biomarkers predicted long-term mortality in the multivariate model.
Conclusions:
- Both sST2 and GDF-15 significantly enhance prognostic evaluation in HF patients.
- GDF-15 demonstrates sustained prognostic value, particularly for predicting mid-term events.
- These biomarkers offer valuable insights beyond traditional risk stratification in chronic HF.
Aims:
Inflammation and cardiac remodelling are common and synergistic pathways in heart failure (HF). Emerging biomarkers such as soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), which are linked to inflammation and fibrosis process, have been proposed as prognosis factors. However, their potential additive values remain poorly investigated.
Methods And Results:
Here, we aimed at evaluating inflammatory and remodelling biomarkers to predict both short-term and long-term mortality in a population with chronic HF in comparison with other classical clinical or biological markers (i.e. N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, hs-cTnT, C-reactive protein) alone or using meta-analysis global group in chronic HF risk score in a cohort of 182 patients followed during 80 months (interquartile range: 12.3-90.0). Proportional hazard assumption does not hold for sST2 and C-reactive protein, and follow-up was split into short term (less than 1 year), midterm (between 1 and 5 years), and long term (after 5 years). In univariate analysis, C-reactive protein and sST2 were predictive of short-term mortality but not of middle term and long term whereas GDF-15 was predictive of short and mid-term but not of long-term mortality. In a multivariate model after adjustment for meta-analysis global group in chronic HF score including the three markers, only sST2 was predictive of short-term mortality (P = 0.0225), and only GDF-15 was predictive of middle term mortality (P = 0.0375). None of the markers was predictive of long-term mortality.
Conclusions:
Our results demonstrate that both sST2 and GDF-15 significantly improve the prognosis evaluation of HF patients and suggest that the value of GDF-15 is more sustained overtime and could predict middle term events.
More Related Videos
08:51Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
Published on: September 20, 2024
07:20Dried Blood Spot Collection of Health Biomarkers to Maximize Participation in Population Studies
Published on: January 28, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Heart Failure V: Medical Management