Quality of life considerations in uveal melanoma patients: a systematic review

The aim of this study is to examine the quality of life (QOL) outcomes of patients undergoing different uveal melanoma (UM) treatments and to appraise the literature on the topic.

A systematic review was conducted to address the study objective. Patients undergoing UM treatment with or without metastasis were eligible for inclusion in this review.

A literature search was performed using National Library of Medicine (PubMed), Embase, Ovid online, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. We included all English, original retrospective or prospective studies published between January 1998 to September 2019 in which the primary outcome was the QOL of patients with treated UM.

Our search strategy yielded 101 articles. Of these, 18 articles met all our inclusion criteria. The majority of included articles (61%) are cross-sectional studies. On average, each study employed 2 different QOL assessment tools. Overall, physical functioning and mental well-being are impaired in patients with UM after treatment compared with the general population. The severity of the impairment decreases as early as 3 months post-treatment; 8 of 12 studies comparing treatment options reported no statistical difference in physical functioning between treatments; 4 of 12 studies reported better visual function with radiation therapy compared with enucleation, 2 of which described no difference between the 2 options at long-term. Anxiety is more prevalent than depression, and both decrease to less than 10% at 1-year follow-up.

Overall, there is no significant difference in long-term QOL in patients with UM from different treatment groups past 1-year follow-up. This work underscores the need for and importance of developing a standardized, complete assessment tool tailored to the challenges inherent to the diagnosis of UM.