Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025
Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
Published on: October 20, 2023
Evaluation of the Pterygomaxillary Separation Pattern in Le Fort I Osteotomy Using Different Cutting Instruments
Suheyb Bilge1, Yusuf Nuri Kaba1, Ahmet Emin Demirbas2
1Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erciyes University Faculty of Dentistry, Kayseri, Turkey.
Purpose:
Pterygomaxillary separation (PMS) is considered the main reason for serious complications associated with Le Fort I osteotomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a piezo surgery, ultrasonic bone scalpel, or conventional bur used in Le Fort I osteotomy has an influence on PMS patterns.
Materials And Methods:
Using a retrospective cohort study design, we enrolled a sample composed of patients who underwent orthognathic surgery. The primary predictor variables were the cutting instruments (ultrasonic bone scalpel, piezo surgery, and Lindeman bur) used to perform Le Fort I osteotomy. Other variables were demographic and anatomic parameters. The outcome variable was the type of PMS pattern, classified as follows: type 1, PMS at the pterygomaxillary junction (ideal PMS); type 2, PMS at the greater palatine foramen; type 3, PMS from the posterior wall of the maxillary sinus; and type 4, PMS with lateral or medial pterygoid fracture. Anatomic parameters, that is, the thickness and width of the pterygomaxillary junction and distance of the greater palatine foramen, were measured on preoperative cone-beam computed tomography images. The pattern of PMS was evaluated on postoperative cone-beam computed tomography. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and the Pearson χ2 test. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:
This study sample was composed of 96 PMSs in 48 patients. The most common type of PMS was type 1 (58), followed by type 4 (21), type 2 (10), and type 3 (7). A statistically significant relation was found between the cutting instrument and the ideal separation (type 1 PMS) pattern (P = .032), and the highest rate of the ideal separation pattern was seen in the ultrasonic bone scalpel group, at 24 of 32, compared with 22 of 38 in the piezo surgery group and 12 of 26 in the conventional bur group.
Conclusions:
According to the study, the ultrasonic bone scalpel is safer than other cutting instruments in terms of the ideal separation of the pterygomaxillary junction.
