Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
Early Predictors of Performance Deficiencies in Academic Faculty: Pre-Employment Red Flags
William O Cooper1, Jill H Simmons1, Paul E Moore2
1Office of Faculty Development, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine (WO Cooper, JH Simmons, and JE Foster), Nashville, Tenn; Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine (WO Cooper, JH Simmons, PE Moore, MG Rush, TD Rice, S Bolina, K Lowe, and SA Webber), Nashville, Tenn.
Objective:
To determine whether faculty who had red flags (unprofessional behavior, delayed response to queries, or delayed submission of required documentation) during pre-employment were more likely to have performance deficiencies than faculty who did not have red flags.
Methods:
The study included 187 faculty consecutively hired in a Department of Pediatrics in a large academic health system from 2013 to 2018. Faculty with and without pre-employment red flags were compared to identify the proportion who had subsequent performance deficiencies related to documentation, unprofessional behavior, performance, or premature departure from the faculty.
Results:
Most of the hired faculty were female (127, 0.68), physicians (136, 0.73), and clinicians or clinician-educators (124, 0.67). Sixteen faculty (0.09) had pre-employment red flags. In the 3 years after hiring, 31 (0.17) of the faculty cohort had at least 1 performance deficiency. Faculty with pre-employment red flags were more than 4 times as likely to experience a performance deficiency during follow-up (0.56 vs 0.13, P < .001). The hazard ratio for performance deficiency comparing faculty with pre-employment red flags to those without was 5.98 (95% confidence interval 2.73-13.1, P < .0001).
Conclusions:
Faculty who had pre-employment red flags were significantly more likely to experience subsequent performance deficiencies. Given the substantial investment that individuals and academic medical centers make in recruiting and hiring new faculty, efforts to identify and assist faculty members at risk provide academic departments opportunities to provide the best environment for success for all faculty.
More Related Videos
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Confirmation Biases
Reliability and Validity
Fundamental Attribution Error
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory