Immunochemical analysis on polypropylene mesh: does mesh size make a difference?

The aim of the study is to demonstrate the impact of the size of implanted mesh in relation to its immunohistochemical reaction implanted into animal models.

An experimental study utilizing 54 female Sprague Dawley (SD) rats was divided into five groups: control, sham, and study groups (mesh-small [M-S], mesh-medium [M-M], mesh-large [M-L]). The M-S group used a mesh size of 0.2 × 0.2 cm, the M-M group a mesh size of 0.5 × 0.5 cm, and the M-L a mesh size of 0.7 × 1.0 cm. The sham group underwent vaginal dissection with no mesh implantation. The rats were sacrificed using isoflurane overdose on days 7 and 30. The mesh with the surrounding vaginal and bladder wall tissues were removed and processed for histochemical and western blot analysis.

There is a significant increase in IL-1 and TNF-α immunoreactivity in the M-M and M-L groups on day 7 when compared with the sham group with p values of 0.001 and < 0.001 respectively. M-L showed significantly higher immunoreactivity to TNF-α persisting until day 30. All study groups presented a significantly higher immunoreactivity to MMP-2 and NGF on day 7. However, reactivity to NGF does not persist to day 30 in all groups. Immunoreactivity to CD 31 on days 7 and 30 appears significantly greater in the M-M and M-L groups, with the reaction in the M-L group continuing until day 30.

Mesh size is directly proportional to the inflammatory reaction in the host tissue. The prolonged inflammatory process leads to delayed tissue remodeling and angiogenesis, which could delay mesh-tissue integration.