Five-year outcomes of endovascular repair of complicated acute type B aortic dissections

Joseph E Bavaria1, William T Brinkman2, G Chad Hughes3

  • 1Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

Insights

The Valiant Captivia thoracic stent graft demonstrated effectiveness in managing acute complicated type B aortic dissections over 5 years. This study shows positive aortic remodeling and sustained outcomes, supporting its use in challenging cases.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Vascular Surgery
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is standard for acute complicated type B aortic dissections.
  • Long-term outcomes of single-device TEVAR for this condition are not well-established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the long-term (5-year) outcomes of the Valiant Captivia thoracic stent graft in patients with acute complicated type B aortic dissections.
  • To assess aortic remodeling, survival, secondary procedures, and adverse events.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, nonrandomized Dissection Trial involving 50 patients treated with the Valiant Captivia thoracic stent graft.
  • Assessment of all-cause mortality, secondary procedures, serious adverse events, and core lab imaging for aortic remodeling.
  • Clinical and imaging follow-up compliance was 78% at 5 years.

Main Results:

  • At 5 years, freedom from dissection-related mortality was 83%, from secondary procedures was 86%, and from endoleaks was 85%.
  • 89% of patients achieved complete false lumen thrombosis in the stented segment.
  • 94% of patients showed stable or increased true lumen diameter, and 77% showed stable or decreased false lumen diameter.

Conclusions:

  • The Valiant Captivia thoracic stent graft system showed effective long-term management of acute complicated type B aortic dissections.
  • Positive and sustained aortic remodeling was observed.
  • Survival and adverse event rates were consistent with previous TEVAR studies, despite follow-up limitations.
Abstract