Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Optimizing High-risk Infant Follow-up in Nonresearch-based Paradigms: The New England Follow-up Network
Jonathan S Litt1, Erika M Edwards2, Shabnam Lainwala3
1Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
Insights
This study highlights a low rate of clinical follow-up for high-risk infants after Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) discharge, indicating significant opportunities for improving post-discharge care and developmental outcomes for extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants.
Area of Science:
- Neonatology
- Pediatric Quality Improvement
- Infant Development
Background:
- Quality improvement initiatives in neonatology often cease at Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) discharge.
- Effective follow-through care for high-risk infants, particularly extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants, is critical for optimizing long-term health and developmental trajectories.
- Characterizing post-discharge outcomes is essential for identifying areas needing targeted interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish the first regional quality improvement collaborative focused on post-Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) discharge follow-through care for high-risk infants.
- To characterize the follow-up care and outcomes of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants in New England.
Main Methods:
- Eleven New England follow-up programs partnered with the Vermont Oxford Network (VON) for an ELBW data collection project.
- Data were collected on health status and developmental outcomes at 18-24 months corrected for gestational age (CGA) for infants born ≤1,000 g or <28 weeks gestation between 2014-2016.
- VON managed data compilation and analysis.
Main Results:
- Only 52.0% (516/993) of eligible infants attended follow-up visits.
- High rates of rehospitalization (33.9%), significant growth deficiencies (19.3% <10th percentile weight), and developmental concerns (9.1% cerebral palsy, 18.4% low composite score on Bayley Scales) were observed.
- Essential screenings, such as hearing, were not consistently performed (61.4%), and substantial demographic data were missing.
Conclusions:
- The New England Follow-up Network's initial project revealed a low rate of clinical follow-up for high-risk infants post-Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) discharge.
- Numerous opportunities exist to enhance post-discharge care, addressing growth, development, and screening needs.
- Future collaborative efforts will focus on improving follow-through services through shared learning and comparative outcome analysis.
Objectives:
To establish the first regional quality improvement collaborative solely dedicated to follow-through care of high-risk infants after Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge and to characterize extremely low birth weight (ELBW) follow-up in New England.
Methods:
Eleven of 14 follow-up programs in New England partnered with the Vermont Oxford Network (VON) ELBW project for an initial data collection project. We collected information about the health status and developmental outcomes of infants born ≤1,000 g or younger than 28 weeks 2014-2016 at the 18-24 months corrected for gestational age (CGA) follow-up visit. VON collected and compiled the data.
Results:
Of 993 eligible infants, 516 (52.0%) had follow-up visits. The rehospitalization rate was 33.9%, mostly respiratory illness. Ninety-six children (19.3%) had weight less than 10th percentile and 44 (8.9%) had weight less than third percentile at 18-24 months. Only 170 (61.4%) children had recommended hearing screening after NICU discharge. Forty-six (9.1%) had cerebral palsy; 81 of the 441 infants that completed all 3 sections of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, third edition (18.4%) had any composite score less than 70. Over half of the social and demographic data were missing.
Conclusion:
Most quality initiatives in neonatology stop at NICU discharge. This first project by the New England Follow-up Network showed a low rate for clinical follow-up. It demonstrated many opportunities to improve postdischarge follow-through specific to NICU-based care. Future projects will aim to improve the quality of follow-through services through collaborative learning, data sharing, and comparative outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Longitudinal Research
Clinical Trials: Overview
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

