Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025
Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024
A Quantitative Approach for the Objective Assessment of Coupling Efficiency for an Active Middle Ear Implant by
Laura Fröhlich1, Stefan K Plontke, Torsten Rahne
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle (Saale), Germany.
Objective:
The coupling efficiency of a semi-implantable active middle ear implant with an electromagnetically driven floating mass transducer coupled to a middle ear ossicle or the round window can only be quantified postoperatively in cooperative patients by measuring behavioral vibroplasty in situ thresholds in comparison with bone conduction thresholds. The objective of the study was to develop a method to objectively determine the vibroplasty in situ thresholds by determining calibration factors from the relation between the objective and behavioral vibroplasty in situ thresholds.
Study Design:
Prospective experimental study.
Patients:
Fifteen patients, implanted with an active middle ear implant for at least 6 months.
Intervention:
Diagnostic.
Main Outcome Measures:
Vibroplasty in situ thresholds measured objectively by auditory steady state responses (floating mass transducer [FMT]ASSR). Subjective vibroplasty in situ thresholds were measured in this experimental ASSR set-up (FMTsubj.) and behaviorally by pure-tone audiometry (vibrogram). All thresholds were obtained at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz.
Results:
Thresholds could be objectively measured by ASSR in all patients. Differences between the FMTASSR and FMTsubj. were statistically significant but small. A significant correlation was found between the FMTASSR and the vibrogram thresholds at 4000 Hz but not for the other test frequencies.
Conclusion:
The method is feasible to measure objective vibroplasty in situ thresholds in active middle ear implant users. Since calibration factors could not be determined for all frequencies, the method is only applicable to comparatively determine the coupling efficiency of the floating mass transducer.
