Selection history is relative
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 15, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Ming-Ray Liao1, Mark K Britton1, Brian A Anderson1
1Texas A&M University, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-4235, United States.
Abstract:
Visual attention can be tuned to specific features to aid in visual search. The way in which these search strategies are established and maintained is flexible, reflecting goal-directed attentional control, but can exert a persistent effect on selection that remains even when these strategies are no longer advantageous, reflecting an attentional bias driven by selection history. Apart from feature-specific search, recent studies have shown that attention can be tuned to target-nontarget relationships. Here we tested whether a relational search strategy continues to bias attention in a subsequent task, where the relationally better color and former target color both serve as distractors (Experiment 1) or as potential targets (Experiment 2). We demonstrate that a relational bias can persist in a subsequent task in which color serves as a task-irrelevant feature, both impairing and facilitating visual search performance. Our findings extend our understanding of the relational account of attentional control and the nature of selection history effects on attention.
Related Concept Videos
Hindsight Biases
Relative Frequency Histogram
Serial Position Effect
What is Evolutionary History?
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
First Impression

