Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
cBIN1 Score (CS) Identifies Ambulatory HFrEF Patients and Predicts Cardiovascular Events
Tara C Hitzeman1, Yu Xie2, Ronit H Zadikany2
1Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Insights
The Cardiac Bridging Integrator 1 (cBIN1) score (CS) effectively identifies myocardial remodeling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A high CS predicts cardiovascular events and improves risk prediction models in HFrEF patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomarker Discovery
- Molecular Cardiology
Background:
- Cardiac Bridging Integrator 1 (cBIN1) is a key protein in cardiomyocyte t-tubule calcium handling, with reduced transcription in heart failure.
- Plasma cBIN1 levels decrease in heart failure, leading to the development of the cBIN1 score (CS) as an inverse index of myocardial remodeling.
- Previous studies established CS utility in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) for diagnosis and prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of the cBIN1 score (CS) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- To assess the correlation of CS with clinical parameters and its incremental value over existing risk factors and NT-proBNP in HFrEF.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 158 ambulatory HFrEF patients and 115 matched controls.
- Plasma cBIN1 levels were measured to calculate CS.
- One-year follow-up data were collected to assess cardiovascular events.
- Comparison with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was performed.
Main Results:
- CS was significantly higher in HFrEF patients (median 1.9) compared to controls (median 0; p < 0.0001).
- A high CS (≥ 1.9) predicted increased cardiovascular events within 1 year (43% vs. 26%; p = 0.01).
- Adding CS to a risk model including demographics, clinical factors, and NT-proBNP significantly improved risk reclassification (NRI 0.64; p = 0.006).
Conclusions:
- CS is a mechanistically distinct and effective biomarker for differentiating myocardial health in HFrEF patients.
- Elevated CS reflects advanced disease, pathological cardiac remodeling, and predicts 1-year cardiovascular event risk in ambulatory HFrEF.
- CS serves as a valuable marker of myocardial remodeling in HFrEF, independent of volume status.
Background:
Cardiac Bridging Integrator 1 (cBIN1) is a membrane deformation protein that generates calcium microdomains at cardiomyocyte t-tubules, whose transcription is reduced in heart failure, and is released into blood. cBIN1 score (CS), an inverse index of plasma cBIN1, measures cellular myocardial remodeling. In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), CS diagnoses ambulatory heart failure and prognosticates hospitalization. The performance of CS has not been tested in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Methods And Results:
CS was determined from plasma of patients recruited in a prospective study. Two comparative cohorts consisted of 158 ambulatory HFrEF patients (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, 57 ± 10 years, 80% men) and 115 age and sex matched volunteers with no known history of HF. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations were also analyzed for comparison. CS follows a normal distribution with a median of 0 in the controls, which increases to a median of 1.9 (p < 0.0001) in HFrEF patients. CS correlates with clinically assessed New York Heart Association Class (p = 0.007). During 1-year follow-up, a high CS (≥ 1.9) in patients predicts increased cardiovascular events (43% vs. 26%, p = 0.01, hazard ratio 1.9). Compared to a model with demographics, clinical risk factors, and NT-proBNP, adding CS to the model improved the overall continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI 0.64; 95% CI 0.18-1.10; p = 0.006). Although performance for diagnosis and prognosis was similar to CS, NT-proBNP did not prognosticate between patients whose NT-proBNP values were > 400 pg/ml.
Conclusion:
CS, which is mechanistically distinct from NT-proBNP, successfully differentiates myocardial health between patients with HFrEF and matched controls. A high CS reflects advanced NYHA stage, pathologic cardiac muscle remodeling, and predicts 1-year risk of cardiovascular events in ambulatory HFrEF patients. CS is a marker of myocardial remodeling in HFrEF patients, independent of volume status.
More Related Videos
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Heart Failure V: Medical Management