Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Understanding Navon: Different designs of local-global tasks capture different bias effects.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same author

Tracing aesthetic experience from perception and conception to appraisal using deep convolutional neural networks.

iScience·2026

Same author

"You're the child I never wanted": an interpretative phenomenological analysis about the invisible struggle of families in crisis raising a child with persistent and severe regulatory problems.

BMC psychology·2026

Same author

Assessing peripheral oxytocin and cortisol levels and epigenetic variations of oxytocin receptor and glucocorticoid receptor genes in school-aged preterm-born children.

Progress in neurobiology·2026

Same author

From pixels to perception: A benchmark for human-like symmetry detection.

Vision research·2026

Same author

Subclinical but significant: A multi-informant comparative study on early socio-emotional difficulties in preterm preschoolers.

Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Investigating the Neural Mechanisms of Aware and Unaware Fear Memory with fMRI

Investigating the Neural Mechanisms of Aware and Unaware Fear Memory with fMRI

Published on: October 6, 2011

Pinpointing the optimal spatial frequency range for automatic neural facial fear processing.

Stephanie Van der Donck¹, Tiffany Tang², Milena Dzhelyova³

¹Center for Developmental Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Autism Research (LAuRes), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

|July 17, 2020

Summary

Detecting fearful faces rapidly requires high spatial frequency (HSF) information. Even with only HSFs, the brain can implicitly differentiate fearful from neutral facial expressions.

Keywords:

EEG FPVS Facial emotion processing Implicit fear detection Spatial frequency

More Related Videos

Modulation of the Neurophysiological Response to Fearful and Stressful Stimuli Through Repetitive Religious Chanting

Modulation of the Neurophysiological Response to Fearful and Stressful Stimuli Through Repetitive Religious Chanting

Published on: November 4, 2021

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Investigating the Neural Mechanisms of Aware and Unaware Fear Memory with fMRI

Investigating the Neural Mechanisms of Aware and Unaware Fear Memory with fMRI

Published on: October 6, 2011

Modulation of the Neurophysiological Response to Fearful and Stressful Stimuli Through Repetitive Religious Chanting

Modulation of the Neurophysiological Response to Fearful and Stressful Stimuli Through Repetitive Religious Chanting

Published on: November 4, 2021

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Visual Perception
Cognitive Psychology

Background:

Facial emotional processing relies on both low and high spatial frequencies (LSFs and HSFs).
Previous research lacks consensus on the specific role of spatial frequency (SF) information in processing fearful faces.
Inconsistent methodologies, particularly varying SF cut-offs and task demands, hinder cross-study comparisons.

Purpose of the Study:

To determine the minimal spatial frequency (SF) information essential for rapid, implicit detection of fearful faces.
To investigate the SF range required for automatic fear discrimination without predefined LSF/HSF boundaries.
To establish an objective neural index for fear discrimination across the SF spectrum.

Main Methods:

Utilized fast periodic visual stimulation combined with electroencephalography (EEG).
Presented neutral faces periodically interleaved with fearful faces at a rate of 6 Hz.
Quantified fear discrimination using a neural index at 1.2 Hz, systematically varying SF content from very low/high to full spectrum over 70 seconds.

Main Results:

A minimum SF threshold above 5.93 cycles per image (cpi) is necessary for implicit fear-from-neutral face discrimination.
High spatial frequency (HSF) information alone, within the 94.82–189.63 cpi range, is sufficient for extracting facial emotional expressions.
The study identified a precise neural marker for fear discrimination linked to specific SF ranges.

Conclusions:

Implicitly differentiating fearful from neutral faces necessitates spatial frequencies above 5.93 cpi.
High spatial frequencies (HSFs) are critically important and sufficient for rapid, automatic fear detection.
This research provides a refined understanding of the spatial frequency basis of facial emotion recognition.