Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
Published on: May 1, 2018
Mapping of Agricultural Subsurface Drainage Systems Using a Frequency-Domain Ground Penetrating Radar and Evaluating
Triven Koganti1, Ellen Van De Vijver2, Barry J Allred3
1Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Mapping buried subsurface drainage systems is crucial for understanding nutrient loss and improving farm drainage. A new 3D ground penetrating radar (GPR) and electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensor combination shows promise for efficient, non-invasive drain mapping in various soil types.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Engineering
- Geophysics
- Soil Science
Background:
- Subsurface drainage systems are vital for managing excess soil water in poorly drained agricultural lands.
- Traditional drain mapping methods are invasive, time-consuming, and risk damaging existing infrastructure.
- Non-invasive geophysical sensors offer a promising alternative for efficient and accurate subsurface drainage mapping.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a stepped-frequency continuous wave three-dimensional ground penetrating radar (3D-GPR) for subsurface drainage mapping.
- To assess the performance of a 3D-GPR in combination with a single-frequency multi-receiver electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensor.
- To correlate sensor performance with various soil types, ranging from sand to clay till.
Main Methods:
- Deployment of a 3D-GPR with a wide antenna array for subsurface drainage detection.
- Integration and evaluation of a multi-receiver EMI sensor alongside the 3D-GPR.
- Testing the combined sensor system across twelve diverse agricultural study sites.
Main Results:
- The 3D-GPR successfully mapped drainpipes at five sites with sandy, sandy loam, loamy sand, and organic topsoils.
- Drainage mapping success was limited at seven sites due to the 3D-GPR's restricted signal penetration depth in certain soil conditions.
- Electrical conductivity estimates from EMI data correlated with 3D-GPR success, suggesting its utility in explaining performance variations.
Conclusions:
- The 3D-GPR and EMI sensor combination shows potential for non-invasive subsurface drainage mapping, particularly in less conductive soils.
- Soil electrical conductivity is a key factor influencing the penetration depth and effectiveness of GPR for drain detection.
- Further research is needed to optimize sensor performance across a wider range of soil types and hydrological conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments
Taping Over Different Ground Profiles
Field Application of Global Positioning System

