Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 14, 2025

06:08
A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
878
Technical Note: Efficient and accurate MRI-only based treatment planning of the prostate using bulk density
Hazel Mhairi McCallum1, Sebastian Andersson2, Jonathan James Wyatt1
1Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK.
Medical Physics
|July 19, 2020
Summary
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only treatment planning for prostate cancer using bulk density assignment achieves clinically acceptable accuracy. This robust MRI-only approach is feasible for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy Physics
- Image-guided Radiation Therapy
Background:
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior soft-tissue contrast compared to computed tomography (CT).
- MRI-only workflows eliminate the need for CT, reducing patient dose and streamlining treatment planning.
- Accurate electron density assignment is crucial for dose calculation in MRI-only radiotherapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the dosimetric accuracy and robustness of an MRI-only prostate radiotherapy planning approach.
- To assess a bulk density assignment method using automatically segmented bone and soft tissue regions.
- To compare MRI-only dose calculations with CT-based calculations for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
Main Methods:
- Twenty prostate cancer patients underwent planning CT and MRI scans for VMAT.
- Atlas-based segmentation (ABS) was used to identify bone and soft tissue regions for bulk density assignment.
- Various soft tissue (0.95-1.03 g/cm³) and bone (1.15-1.65 g/cm³) density pairs were tested to minimize dose difference compared to CT.
Main Results:
- An optimal density pair of 0.98 g/cm³ for soft tissue and 1.20 g/cm³ for bone yielded dose differences <1% compared to CT.
- Atlas-based segmentation demonstrated high accuracy for bone contouring (Dice similarity coefficient 0.94, Mean Distance to Agreement <1 mm).
- Clinically acceptable dose differences were achieved with both automatic and manually adjusted bone contours.
Conclusions:
- Bulk density assignment on MRI images provides dosimetrically accurate and robust results for prostate VMAT planning.
- An integrated MRI-only workflow using two bulk densities is a feasible and reliable approach for prostate cancer radiotherapy.
- This method supports the transition to advanced MRI-only treatment planning systems.
Keywords:
MRI-only based radiotherapyVMATatlas-based segmentationbulk density assignmentmagnetic resonanceprostate patients
