Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 14, 2025

A Porcine Model of Acute Autologous Pulmonary Embolism
Published on: September 6, 2024
Plasma growth differentiation factor 15 levels for predicting serious adverse events and bleeding in acute pulmonary
Marta Skowrońska1, Martyna Skrzyńska2, Michał Machowski2
1Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology with the Centre for Management of Venous Thromboembolic Disease, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. marta.z.kozlowska@gmail.com
Introduction:
Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF‑15), a cytokine induced in the myocardium by pressure overload and ischemia, has a well‑established prognostic role for diseases of the left ventricle. Plasma GDF‑15 concentrations were shown to predict bleeding events in patients with atrial fibrillation on anticoagulation.
Objectives:
To investigate the prognostic value of GDF‑15 in acute pulmonary embolism (PE).
Patients And Methods:
This was a prospective observational study of 77 patients hospitalized for PE. The median length of hospital stay and follow-up was 9 days. Plasma GDF‑15 levels were measured using an automated sandwich electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. The outcome measures were: 1) in‑hospital serious adverse events (SAE; death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, need for urgent reperfusion therapy, catecholamine administration), and 2) major bleeding or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding.
Results:
There were 12 SAE and 5 bleeding events. The median (interquartile range) GDF‑15 concentration at admission was 2354 ng/l (1151-4750 ng/l). GDF‑15 concentrations increased according to risk subgroup. Patients with serious adverse events or bleeding events had higher baseline concentrations of GDF‑15 (median [interquartile range], 3460 ng/l [2 531-12 363 ng/l] vs 2034 ng/l [1121-4449 ng/l]; P = 0.01). The area under the curve for GDF‑15, high‑sensitivity cardiac troponin T, and N‑terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentrations for predicting SAE was similar, the area under the curve of GDF‑15 levels for predicting bleeding was 0.783 (95% CI, 0.62-0.946; P = 0.001) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.567-0.853; P = 0.004) for predicting any adverse event. In the multivariable analysis, GDF‑15 greater than 1680 ng/l emerged as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (odds ratio, 8.9; P = 0.047).
Conclusions:
Plasma GDF‑15 concentrations may be a promising biomarker for predicting hemodynamic destabilization and bleeding complications in PE.
More Related Videos
13:08Measurement of Factor V Activity in Human Plasma Using a Microplate Coagulation Assay
Published on: September 9, 2012
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management