Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

272
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
272
Punishment01:27

Punishment

708
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
708
Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

366
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
366
Law of Effect01:06

Law of Effect

2.3K
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
2.3K
Primary and Secondary Reinforcers01:23

Primary and Secondary Reinforcers

732
In psychology, reinforcement is a key concept in behavior modification. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments involving rats in what is known as a Skinner box. The rats learned to press a lever to receive food, a primary reinforcer that fulfilled their innate need for nourishment.
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...
732
Operant Conditioning01:21

Operant Conditioning

2.6K
Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contributions of the interaction between mu-opioid receptors and dopamine receptors in the regulation of risky decision making.

Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry·2026
Same author

Sex differences in neuromodulatory subcortical systems and their implications for Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

The role of ovarian hormones in risk aversion in female rats.

Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2026
Same author

Individual differences in stress coping are linked to working memory performance in male and female F344 rats.

Physiology & behavior·2025
Same author

Lateral orbitofrontal cortex encodes presence of risk and subjective risk preference during decision-making.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same author

Cholinergic regulation of decision making under risk of punishment.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.3K

Reward/Punishment-Based Decision Making in Rodents.

Caitlin A Orsini1, Nicholas W Simon2

  • 1Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

Current Protocols in Neuroscience
|July 21, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Rodent models help study decision-making deficits in psychiatric diseases by examining how consequences like punishment impact choices. These models explore risk and delayed punishment to understand compromised decision-making mechanisms.

Keywords:
decision makingdelaydiscountingpunishmentratrewardreward/punishmentrisk

More Related Videos

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

14.2K
A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.3K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

14.2K
A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Science
  • Psychiatric Research

Background:

  • Decision-making deficits are central to psychiatric disorders, including substance abuse and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
  • Understanding the neural basis of adaptive choice behavior and its pathological alterations is crucial.
  • Consequences, involving risk (punishment probability) and temporal delay (delayed punishment), are key factors in decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present rodent models for studying decision-making processes, particularly those involving explicit punishment.
  • To explore how different aspects of consequences (risk and delay) influence decision-making in animal models.
  • To demonstrate the utility of these models in psychiatric disease research.

Main Methods:

  • Focus on two behavioral protocols that incorporate explicit punishment to model human decision-making consequences.
  • Discuss experimental design parameters for these decision-making tasks.
  • Utilize a Risky Decision-Making Task (RDT) and a Delayed Punishment Decision-Making Task (DPDT).

Main Results:

  • The presented models recapitulate distinct facets of consequences encountered in human decision-making.
  • Behavioral training and reward discrimination protocols support the main tasks.
  • These models provide a framework for investigating the neural mechanisms of choice behavior under punishment.

Conclusions:

  • Rodent models incorporating punishment are valuable tools for understanding decision-making in psychiatric conditions.
  • These models allow for the systematic study of how risk and delay affect choice behavior.
  • The RDT and DPDT offer specific paradigms for translational research in psychiatry.