Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

9.3K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
9.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.5K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.5K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.7K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.7K
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.2K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.2K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

9.4K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
9.4K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.4K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Directionality-Induced Jamming in Multiplex Networks.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Detecting changepoints in dynamical systems: Modeling time-varying transmission of seasonal influenza.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Rumor propagation on hypergraphs.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Mechanistic interplay between information spreading and opinion polarization.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

The interplay between pitch control and top speed in soccer considering the stamina factor.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Leveraging knowledge for explainable AI in personalized cancer treatment: challenges and future directions.

Frontiers in digital health·2025
Same journal

Erratum: Low-dimensional model for adaptive networks of spiking neurons [Phys. Rev. E 111, 014422 (2025)].

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Disentangling the effects of many-body forces on depletion interactions.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Charge transport and mode transition in dual-energy electron beam diodes.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Optimization of multisite reactions in complex compartmentalized media.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Origin of geometric cohesion in nonconvex granular materials: Interplay between interdigitation and rotational constraints enhancing frictional stability.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Interaction of walkers with a standing Faraday wave.

Physical review. E·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 14, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K

Quantifying uncertainty in a predictive model for popularity dynamics.

Joseph D O'Brien1, Alberto Aleta2,3, Yamir Moreno2,3,4

  • 1MACSI, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland.

Physical Review. E
|July 22, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new analytical method for understanding online information cascades using the Hawkes process. The approach allows for precise predictions of future event distributions and cascade dynamics.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 14, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Social Science
  • Network Science
  • Information Theory

Background:

  • Online information cascades, such as viral content or news spreading, are often modeled using the Hawkes process.
  • Existing methods rely heavily on empirical data or simulations, limiting analytical insights into cascade dynamics.
  • Understanding the parameters influencing these cascades is crucial for predicting information diffusion patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a fully tractable analytical approach for describing the distribution of events in a Hawkes process.
  • To enable the analysis of how process parameters affect cascade dynamics, moving beyond purely empirical or simulation-based methods.
  • To provide a theoretical framework for predicting future event distributions within observed time windows.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a differential-equation approach to derive the governing equations for a general branching process.
  • Applied these equations to analytically model the Hawkes process and its event distributions.
  • Validated theoretical findings through extensive computer simulations of branching processes.

Main Results:

  • Presented a tractable analytical framework for the Hawkes process, offering insights into cascade behavior.
  • Demonstrated the ability to predict the future distribution of events based on observed data within a time window.
  • Quantified the impact of process parameters on the dynamics of information cascades.

Conclusions:

  • The developed analytical theory provides a robust foundation for analyzing self-exciting processes governing information spread.
  • This approach facilitates more complete analyses of online information cascades across various communication platforms.
  • Offers the potential to predict cascade dynamics with quantifiable confidence limits, enhancing understanding and control.