Why is plant-growth response to elevated CO₂ amplified when water is limiting, but reduced when nitrogen is limiting?...

Experimental evidence indicates that the stomatal conductance and nitrogen concentration ([N]) of foliage decline under CO₂ enrichment, and that the percentage growth response to elevated CO₂ is amplified under water limitation, but reduced under nitrogen limitation. We advance simple explanations for these responses based on an optimisation hypothesis applied to a simple model of the annual carbon-nitrogen-water economy of trees growing at a CO₂-enrichment experiment at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. The model is shown to have an optimum for leaf [N], stomatal conductance and leaf area index (LAI), where annual plant productivity is maximised. The optimisation is represented in terms of a trade-off between LAI and stomatal conductance, constrained by water supply, and between LAI and leaf [N], constrained by N supply. At elevated CO₂ the optimum shifts to reduced stomatal conductance and leaf [N] and enhanced LAI. The model is applied to years with contrasting rainfall and N uptake. The predicted growth response to elevated CO₂ is greatest in a dry, high-N year and is reduced in a wet, low-N year. The underlying physiological explanation for this contrast in the effects of water versus nitrogen limitation is that leaf photosynthesis is more sensitive to CO₂ concentration ([CO₂]) at lower stomatal conductance and is less sensitive to [CO₂] at lower leaf [N].