Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

10:16
Generation of Two-color Antigen Microarrays for the Simultaneous Detection of IgG and IgM Autoantibodies
Published on: September 15, 2016
[Comparison between 2 separation methods of IgM and IgG in serologic diagnosis]
M Acetoso1, A Albertoni, G Aureli
1Laboratorio di analisi chimico-cliniche e microbiologiche, Ospedali Riuniti, U.S.L. 3, Pesaro.
Summary
This study compared two methods for separating immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) from serum. While both methods effectively isolated IgM, significant differences were found in IgG separation efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Biochemistry
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Accurate separation of immunoglobulin (Ig) fractions is crucial for various diagnostic and research applications.
- Protein A and chromatographic techniques are common methods for purifying IgG and IgM from biological samples like serum.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the efficacy of protein A treatment versus chromatographic separation for isolating IgG and IgM fractions from human serum.
- To determine if statistically significant differences exist between these two separation methods for each immunoglobulin class.
Main Methods:
- Quantification of IgG and IgM concentrations in thirty whole serum samples.
- Determination of IgG and IgM concentrations after separation using protein A treatment.
- Determination of IgG and IgM concentrations after separation using chromatographic techniques.
- Statistical analysis of the differences between the two separation methods using Student's t-test.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were observed in the separation of the IgM fraction between protein A treatment and chromatographic separation.
- Statistically significant differences were found in the separation of the IgG fraction when comparing protein A treatment and chromatographic separation.
- This indicates that while both methods are comparable for IgM, IgG isolation varies significantly.
Conclusions:
- Chromatographic separation and protein A treatment yield comparable results for IgM isolation from serum.
- The choice of separation method significantly impacts the yield and purity of the IgG fraction.
- Further investigation may be needed to optimize IgG separation techniques for specific research or clinical needs.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
In 1971, Peter Perlman and Eva Engvall developed an Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA or EIA). ELISA differs from western blot in that the assays are conducted in microtiter plates or in vivo rather than on an absorbent membrane.
There are many different types of ELISAs, but they all involve an antibody molecule whose constant region binds an enzyme, leaving the variable region free to bind its specific antigen. Enzyme-substrate reaction allows the antigen to be visualized or quantified.
There are many different types of ELISAs, but they all involve an antibody molecule whose constant region binds an enzyme, leaving the variable region free to bind its specific antigen. Enzyme-substrate reaction allows the antigen to be visualized or quantified.
Immunocytochemistry and Immunohistochemistry
Immunocytochemistry (ICC) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are techniques that use antibodies to check for specific proteins or antigens in a sample. The technique was first published by Albert Coons in 1941 to detect the presence of pneumococcal antigen in tissue sections from mice infected with Pneumococcus. Immunocytochemistry helps localization of proteins or antigens in individual cells like blood cells, stem cells, etc., while immunohistochemistry does the same for tissue samples.
These...
These...

