Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus
Published on: March 6, 2019
Identifying and overcoming barriers to harmonize newborn screening programs through consensus strategies
Yolanda González-Irazabal1, Guillermo Hernandez de Abajo1, Eduardo Martínez-Morillo1
1Clinical Biochemistry Service, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Insights
Newborn screening (NBS) programs detect diseases early, preventing severe outcomes. However, global disparities in NBS strategies persist, necessitating harmonization efforts for equitable infant healthcare worldwide.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Genetics
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Newborn screening (NBS) programs have a proven track record of over 50 years in early disease detection.
- Early intervention through NBS prevents developmental delays, disabilities, and premature death in infants.
- NBS programs are expanding in scope and complexity, leading to varied international approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the factors contributing to diverse NBS strategies globally.
- To identify challenges and propose solutions for harmonizing international NBS programs.
- To address ethical considerations and disparities in NBS benefits and harms.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing NBS program structures and diagnostic algorithms.
- Analysis of factors influencing NBS policy decisions (healthcare systems, funding, politics).
- Examination of international efforts toward NBS program harmonization.
Main Results:
- Significant variations exist in NBS disease inclusion and screening protocols across countries and regions.
- Healthcare system, financial resources, and policy decisions are key drivers of these differences.
- Previous harmonization attempts have yielded limited success, with disparities remaining.
Conclusions:
- International disparities in NBS programs require urgent attention to ensure equitable infant healthcare.
- Developing uniform decision-making criteria is crucial for minimizing global NBS program inequalities.
- Further research is needed to identify and overcome factors hindering worldwide NBS harmonization.
Abstract:
The benefits of newborn screening (NBS) programs have been widely demonstrated after more than 50 years since first established. NBS enables the detection of the disease before the child shows clinical symptoms, allowing clinicians to act early and facilitating appropriate interventions to prevent or improve adverse outcomes. Delay or lack of medical intervention in these infants may lead to developmental delay, severe disability, or premature death. NBS programs have grown exponentially both in the number of diseases screened and in complexity, creating controversy. New technological advances, as well as the emergence of new therapies that require early disease detection, have allowed for the inclusion of new diseases in NBS screening programs. However, different countries and even different regions have in turn adopted very diverse strategies and diagnostic algorithms when it comes to NBS. There are many factors responsible for these differences, such as the health care system, available funds, local politics, professional groups, and others that depend on the position taken by policymakers. These differences in NBS have led to discrepancies in detection opportunities between countries or regions, which has led to many varied attempts to harmonize NBS programs but not all have been equally satisfactory. Some countries have achieved good results, but always within their borders. Therefore, there are still many differences between NBS programs at the international level that must be overcome. These advances have also brought considerable uncertainty regarding ethical aspects and balance between benefits and harms. For this reason, and so that the situation of disparity in the global NBS programs can be minimized, health authorities must work to develop uniform criteria for decision-making and to take a further step toward harmonization. To do so, it is necessary to identify the crucial factors that lead to the adoption of different NBS programs worldwide, in order to analyze their influence and find ways to overcome them.
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Ethical Dilemmas II

