Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 14, 2025

07:49
Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
Published on: August 16, 2017
7.4K
Selective extinction against redundant species buffers functional diversity
Catalina Pimiento1,2, Christine D Bacon3,4, Daniele Silvestro3,4,5
1Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|July 23, 2020
Summary
Over 23 million years, mollusc diversification increased functional diversity. Recent extinctions disproportionately affected redundant species, preserving essential ecological roles.
Area of Science:
- Paleontology
- Ecology
- Evolutionary Biology
Background:
- Species extinction can disrupt ecological processes.
- Functional diversity, encompassing functional richness and redundancy, is key to ecological stability.
- Limited deep-time, trait-based data hinders understanding of long-term functional diversity responses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reconstruct mollusc diversity dynamics over 23 million years.
- To analyze changes in functional diversity (richness and redundancy).
- To investigate extinction selectivity and its impact on functional diversity.
Main Methods:
- Compiled a large trait dataset of fossil molluscs from the Caribbean (34,011 records, 4422 species).
- Developed a novel Bayesian model for multi-trait-dependent diversification.
- Reconstructed diversity dynamics, functional diversity, and extinction patterns over 23 million years.
Main Results:
- High diversification occurred between 23-5 Mya, increasing functional richness and redundancy.
- Recent extinctions (last 3 million years) led to a 49% species loss but only a 3% loss in functional richness.
- Extinction rates were higher for small, functionally redundant species, indicating competition's role.
Conclusions:
- Long-term diversification and selective extinction of redundant species promoted functional diversity growth.
- Functional diversity buffered ecological functions against extinction impacts.
- Competition may mediate species' responses to environmental change over geological timescales.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
43.6K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
43.6K
Frequency-dependent Selection
22.9K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.9K
Limits to Natural Selection
33.8K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
33.8K
Conservation of Small Populations
16.4K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
16.4K
Habitat Fragmentation
20.7K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
20.7K
Conservation of Declining Populations
12.3K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
12.3K

