Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 14, 2025

06:19
In situ Protocol for Butterfly Pupal Wings Using Riboprobes
Published on: May 28, 2007
11.3K
Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development
Steven M Van Belleghem1, Paola A Alicea Roman1,2, Heriberto Carbia Gutierrez1,3
1Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico.
Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|July 23, 2020
Summary
Butterfly wing patterns show imperfect mimicry due to genetic differences. Gene editing reveals specific wing boundaries where the WntA gene causes divergence, limiting perfect adaptation in Heliconius butterflies.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Genetics
- Animal Behavior
Background:
- Müllerian mimicry demonstrates natural selection's adaptive power.
- The precise extent and causes of imperfect mimicry are often unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- Quantify wing pattern differences in co-mimetic Heliconius butterflies.
- Investigate the role of the WntA gene in imperfect mimicry using gene editing.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of forewing colour patterns in 14 morphs of Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene.
- CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to knock out the WntA gene and observe its effect on wing colour patterns.
Main Results:
- Forewing pattern size is nearly identical between co-mimicking species.
- WntA gene knockout experiments revealed divergent wing boundaries affecting pattern formation differently in each species.
- These boundary differences prevent perfect mimicry.
Conclusions:
- Divergence in gene regulatory networks constrains morphological evolution, even in closely related species.
- Imperfect mimicry in Heliconius butterflies is linked to species-specific WntA gene effects on wing patterning boundaries.
Related Concept Videos
Speciation Rates
22.4K
Overview
22.4K
Nonconscious Mimicry
5.0K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
5.0K
Frequency-dependent Selection
22.9K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.9K
Limits to Natural Selection
33.8K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
33.8K
Convergent Evolution
31.1K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
31.1K
Predator-Prey Interactions
20.8K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
20.8K

