Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response01:29

Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response

339
Geographic Information System (GIS) technology is essential for risk identification, action prioritization, and resource optimization in critical situations like flooding and earthquakes. By integrating spatial and demographic data, GIS provides a comprehensive framework for emergency response.GIS integrates data layers, like rainfall intensity, topography, elevation profiles, and river levels, to model high-risk flood zones. These layers assess areas susceptible to flooding based on their...
339
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

222
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
222
Levels of Use of a GIS01:29

Levels of Use of a GIS

244
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) operate across three levels of application, each representing an increasing degree of complexity: data management, analysis, and prediction. These levels reflect the expanding functionality and versatility of GIS technology in handling spatial data for diverse purposes.Data ManagementAt its foundational level, GIS serves as a tool for data management, enabling the input, storage, retrieval, and organization of spatial data. This level is often employed in...
244
Manipulation and Analysis01:21

Manipulation and Analysis

214
GIS manipulation and analysis functions are vital for decision-making and planning. These activities range from data retrieval tasks, such as selecting information based on specific criteria, to advanced analytical techniques that address complex spatial problems.One critical GIS analysis method is overlaying, which combines multiple data layers to examine impacts. For example, overlaying a river-dammed lake boundary with road networks can identify affected infrastructure. Another common...
214
Selected Data About Geographic Locations01:25

Selected Data About Geographic Locations

182
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) rely on two core types of data: spatial data and attribute data.Spatial DataSpatial data defines the physical location of features within a coordinate system, typically expressed in terms of latitude and longitude. It provides precise positioning for elements like roads, rivers, or buildings.Attribute DataAttribute data complements spatial data by adding descriptive information about these features. For example, a road's spatial data includes its start and...
182
Topographic Surveying and Contours01:29

Topographic Surveying and Contours

675
Topographic surveying is critical for documenting the Earth's surface, focusing on capturing elevations, slopes, and natural and man-made features. It is essential in construction planning, water resource management, and land-use analysis. The primary outcome of such surveys is a topographic map, which uses contour lines to visually represent the shape and slope of the terrain, providing valuable insights into the landscape's characteristics.Contour lines are fundamental to understanding the...
675

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving Sepsis Mortality Prediction With Machine Learning Using Full Region Synthetic Sampling Approach.

Health science reports·2025
Same author

Modelling key ecological factors influencing the distribution and content of silymarin antioxidant in Silybum marianum L.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Enhancing water quality monitoring through the integration of deep learning neural networks and fuzzy method.

Marine pollution bulletin·2024
Same author

Efficiency evaluation of low impact development practices on urban flood risk.

Journal of environmental management·2024
Same author

Software-defined traffic light preemption for faster emergency medical service response in smart cities.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2024
Same author

Author Correction: Using machine learning to predict processes and morphometric features of watershed.

Scientific reports·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
12:26

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM

Published on: October 11, 2016

13.7K

A machine learning framework for multi-hazards modeling and mapping in a mountainous area.

Saleh Yousefi1, Hamid Reza Pourghasemi2, Sayed Naeim Emami1

  • 1Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Department, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Shahrekord, Iran.

Scientific Reports
|July 24, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study developed accurate multi-hazard risk maps for a mountainous region in Iran using machine learning. The models effectively predicted snow avalanches, landslides, wildfires, land subsidence, and floods, aiding disaster mitigation efforts.

More Related Videos

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.3K
Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring
08:16

Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring

Published on: October 24, 2025

269

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
12:26

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM

Published on: October 11, 2016

13.7K
Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.3K
Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring
08:16

Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring

Published on: October 24, 2025

269

Area of Science:

  • Geosciences
  • Environmental Science
  • Disaster Risk Management

Background:

  • Mountainous regions face recurrent extreme natural events.
  • Accurate multi-hazard risk assessment is crucial for disaster mitigation.
  • Previous studies often focused on single hazards, limiting comprehensive risk management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To create an accurate multi-hazard risk map for a mountainous region in Iran.
  • To model the probabilities of snow avalanches, landslides, wildfires, land subsidence, and floods.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning models for multi-hazard prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized machine learning models: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Boosted Regression Tree (BRT), and Generalized Linear Model (GLM).
  • Incorporated climatic, topographic, geological, social, and morphological factors as input variables.
  • Validated model performance using Area Under the Curve (AUC), with all best models achieving AUC > 0.8.

Main Results:

  • Support Vector Machine (SVM) demonstrated highest accuracy for landslides, land subsidence, and floods.
  • Generalized Linear Model (GLM) was optimal for wildfire prediction.
  • Functional Discriminant Analysis (FDA) proved most accurate for snow avalanche risk assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning approaches are highly effective for multi-hazard modeling and risk assessment.
  • The generated risk maps provide essential data for effective hazard management and disaster mitigation.
  • This study offers a valuable baseline for managing future human-environment interactions with natural hazards in the region.