Exploratory analysis of randomized clinical trials in physiotherapy aimed at improving walking speed after stroke

The purpose of the present study was to examine the main characteristics of clinical trials in physiotherapy aimed at improving walking speed after stroke, as well as the correlation between trials' methodological quality and journals' Impact Factor. Searches were conducted on Physiotherapy Evidence Database for all randomized controlled trials aiming at improving walking speed after stroke. Data extracted from the studies were: continent, language, methodological quality, year of publication, number of normalized citations, open access, sample size, measurements of walking speed, interventions, comparators, and prior registration. Data extracted from the journals were: 2018 Impact Factor, open access, endorsement of CONSORT recommendations, predatory classification, PubMed indexing, and Journal Citation Reports category. The main outcomes were journals' Impact Factor, open access, CONSORT recommendations endorsement by the journal, and methodological quality. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to explore the relationships between trials' methodological quality and journals' Impact Factor. Two hundred twenty-seven trials were published in 62 journals. The number of trials has increased over the last years. Most of these trials had citations, moderate methodological quality, were published in English, in open access journals, which endorse the CONSORT recommendations, and had Impact Factor ≥2.0. The results indicated a positive, but weak correlation between methodological quality and journals' Impact Factor. Thus, trials in physiotherapy aimed at improving walking speed after stroke have increased over the last years. Overall, trials had moderate methodological quality and were published in journal with moderate-to-high Impact Factor. Best trials were not necessarily published in journals with high Impact Factor.