Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence
Published on: March 9, 2015
Bloodstain examination and DNA typing from hand-washed bloodstains on clothes
Hiroaki Nakanishi1, Takeshi Ohmori2, Katsumi Yoneyama3
1Department of Forensic Medicine, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
We investigated whether bloodstain examination and DNA typing can be performed on washed bloodstains on clothes. Blood was dropped onto T-shirts made from 100% cotton or 100% polyester. After drying, the T-shirts were hand-washed with handwashing soap, dishwashing detergent, laundry detergent, soap, or just water until the bloodstains could not be seen. After drying the T-shirts, DNA and RNA were extracted simultaneously from the bloodstained areas using commercial kits. RNA was reverse-transcribed to DNA, and then the detection of the mRNAs for HBB, ACTB, and 18S rRNA was examined. DNA was quantified via real-time PCR, and then STR typing was performed with a commercial kit. The luminol and leucomalachite green tests were used as preliminary bloodstain tests, and an immuno-chromatography kit was used to identify human bloodstains. DNA could be extracted from all washed bloodstains, but more DNA was extracted from cotton T-shirts than from polyester T-shirts. STR typing was successful for all bloodstains without issues such as PCR inhibition. In the human bloodstain identification test using mRNA, almost all bloodstains produced a Ct value for HBB and all bloodstains produced a Ct value for 18S rRNA, whereas few bloodstains produced a Ct value for ACTB. All bloodstains reacted positively to luminol, but some were negative for leucomalachite green. Most of the bloodstains did not react positively in the human bloodstain identification test using the immuno-chromatography kit. The results suggest that human bloodstain identification and DNA typing can still be performed after clothes with bloodstains are washed.
We investigated whether bloodstain examination and DNA typing can be performed on washed bloodstains on clothes. Blood was dropped onto T-shirts made from 100% cotton or 100% polyester. After drying, the T-shirts were hand-washed with handwashing soap, dishwashing detergent, laundry detergent, soap, or just water until the bloodstains could not be seen. After drying the T-shirts, DNA and RNA were extracted simultaneously from the bloodstained areas using commercial kits. RNA was reverse-transcribed to DNA, and then the detection of the mRNAs for HBB, ACTB, and 18S rRNA was examined. DNA was quantified via real-time PCR, and then STR typing was performed with a commercial kit. The luminol and leucomalachite green tests were used as preliminary bloodstain tests, and an immuno-chromatography kit was used to identify human bloodstains. DNA could be extracted from all washed bloodstains, but more DNA was extracted from cotton T-shirts than from polyester T-shirts. STR typing was successful for all bloodstains without issues such as PCR inhibition. In the human bloodstain identification test using mRNA, almost all bloodstains produced a Ct value for HBB and all bloodstains produced a Ct value for 18S rRNA, whereas few bloodstains produced a Ct value for ACTB. All bloodstains reacted positively to luminol, but some were negative for leucomalachite green. Most of the bloodstains did not react positively in the human bloodstain identification test using the immuno-chromatography kit. The results suggest that human bloodstain identification and DNA typing can still be performed after clothes with bloodstains are washed.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Classification and Identification
Southern Blot
Denatured DNA fragments must be transferred onto a carrier membrane from the gel to make it accessible to a probe - a small ssDNA fragment complementary to the target DNA...
DNA Isolation
DNA Isolation

