Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 14, 2025

Murine Model of Leukemia Relapse to Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Published on: October 17, 2025
Treatment outcomes in children with Acute lymphoblastic leukemia with versus without coexisting Down's syndrome: A
1Department of Neonatology.
Insights
Children with Down syndrome (DS) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have similar survival rates but higher risks of treatment failure and relapse. New guidelines may be needed to adjust ALL treatment for children with DS.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Oncology
- Genetics
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Down syndrome (DS), or Trisomy 21, affects approximately 1 in 732 newborns in the US.
- Children with DS have a higher incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
- Existing ALL treatment protocols may lead to increased toxicities in children with DS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically analyze and compare treatment outcomes in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients with and without Down syndrome (DS).
- To identify specific differences in survival, remission rates, and treatment-related toxicities between these two groups.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple electronic databases (Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar).
- Data from 31,476 children with ALL (1303 with DS) treated between 1981 and 2011 were analyzed.
- Outcomes were compared using Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), analyzed with RevMan 5.3 software over a 5-10 year follow-up period.
Main Results:
- Event-free survival, overall mortality, and clinical remission rates were similar between ALL children with and without DS.
- However, treatment-related mortality (OR: 4.29) and induction failure (OR: 2.77) were significantly higher in children with DS.
- Total relapse (OR: 1.38) and bone marrow relapse (OR: 1.29) rates were also significantly higher in the DS group, while CNS, testicular, and other relapses showed no significant difference.
Conclusions:
- While event-free survival and overall mortality are comparable, children with DS experience significantly higher treatment-related mortality and induction failure.
- Higher rates of total and bone marrow relapse in ALL children with DS necessitate a review of current treatment protocols.
- Modified treatment regimens focusing on reducing toxicity and relapse risk are recommended for pediatric ALL patients with Down syndrome.
Background:
Down syndrome (DS) also known as Trisomy 21, is a chromosomal disorder affecting approximately 1 in 732newborns annually in the United States. Children with DS are more likely to develop acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). For the management of pediatric ALL, different treatment protocols have been set up since years. However, ALL children with coexisting DS have shown to have increased therapy-related toxicities compared to those without DS. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to systematically analyze the treatment outcomes in acute ALL children with versus without coexisting DS.
Methods:
Electronic databases including the Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google scholar were searched for publications reporting treatment related outcomes in ALL children with versus without co-existing DS. Several treatment protocols were used accordingly. This study had a long-term follow-up time period ranging from 5 to 10 years. The RevMan 5.3 software was used to carry out this analysis. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the results post analysis.
Results:
A total number of 31,476 children with ALL enrolled between the years 1981 and 2011 were included. Among the total number of children with ALL, 1303 had coexisting DS. Our results showed that event-free survival was similar in ALL children with versus without DS (odds ratio [OR]: 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-3.50; P = .55). Overall mortality (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 0.86-3.10; P = .13) and participants who achieved clinical remission (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.12-9.29; P = .97) were also similarly manifested. However, treatment-related mortality (OR: 4.29, 95% CI: 2.90-6.36; P = .00001) and induction failure (OR: 2.77, 95% CI: 1.08-7.07; P = .03) were significantly higher in the DS group. Also, total (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.02-1.88; P = .04) and bone marrow relapses (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.00-1.67; P = .05) were significantly higher in ALL children with DS. Nevertheless, central nervous system relapse (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.60-2.20; P = .67), testicular relapse (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.38-1.85; P = .87), and other relapses (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.27-4.62; P = .88) were not significantly different when these outcomes were separately analyzed.
Conclusion:
Based on this analysis of the treatment outcomes in ALL children with versus without DS, event-free survival, overall mortality, and patients who achieved clinical remission were similar during this long-term follow-up time period. However, due to the significantly higher treatment-related mortality, induction failure, and certain relapses in ALL children with DS, new guidelines might have to focus on reconsidering or modifying treatment regimens for ALL children with DS.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Karyotyping
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

