Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

132
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
132
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

100
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
100
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.7K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.0K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

16.4K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
16.4K
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

1.3K
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Design and analysis of factorial clinical trials: The impact of one treatment's effectiveness on the statistical power and required sample size of the other.

Statistical methods in medical research·2023
Same author

Taking a chance: How likely am I to receive my preferred treatment in a clinical trial?

Statistical methods in medical research·2023
Same author

Unified approach to optimal estimation of mean and standard deviation from sample summaries.

Statistical methods in medical research·2022
Same author

Estimation of standard deviations and inverse-variance weights from an observed range.

Statistics in medicine·2021
Same author

Estimating the rate of overdiagnosis with prostate cancer screening: evidence from the Finnish component of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Cancer causes & control : CCC·2021
Same author

Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy: A "Rule of Three" for data with repeated observations but without a gold standard.

Statistics in medicine·2021
Same journal

Modeling treatment effects on absorbing outcomes in clinical trials: Leveraging longitudinal and ordinal data for efficiency gains.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A joint model for a longitudinal outcome and a progressive multistate model under a mixed observation scheme.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Efficient semi-supervised estimation of optimal individualized treatment regimes with survival outcome.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 14, 2025

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

5.0K

Relative efficiencies of alternative preference-based designs for randomised trials.

S D Walter1, M Bian2

  • 1Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|July 25, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Patient preferences significantly impact clinical trial outcomes. Preference-based trial designs, unlike conventional ones, can measure these selection and preference effects, offering a more complete understanding of treatment impacts.

Keywords:
Clinical trialsefficiencypatient preferencesselection effectsstudy design

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.8K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 14, 2025

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

5.0K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.8K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical trial methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health services research

Background:

  • Clinical trial outcomes can be influenced by patient treatment selection (selection effects) and receipt (preference effects).
  • Conventional parallel group trials cannot evaluate these patient preference effects as preferences are not measured.
  • Patient preferences are crucial for understanding treatment effectiveness and adherence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss preference-based clinical trial designs for measuring selection and preference effects.
  • To compare the potential of preference-based designs against conventional trials.
  • To analyze factors influencing the efficiency of different preference-based designs.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of three preference-based designs: two-stage, fully randomized, and partially randomized.
  • Comparison of estimable effects in conventional versus preference-based trials.
  • Analysis of factors affecting the relative efficiency of preference-based designs.

Main Results:

  • Preference-based designs offer the potential to estimate selection and preference effects, unlike conventional trials.
  • The efficiency of these designs depends on participant indecision, preference rates, and randomization ratios.
  • Different scenarios impact the advantages and disadvantages of each design.

Conclusions:

  • Preference-based designs provide a more comprehensive evaluation of treatment effects by incorporating patient preferences.
  • Understanding selection and preference effects is vital for improving clinical trial validity and generalizability.
  • The choice of design depends on specific trial characteristics and research questions.