Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

27.7K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
27.7K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

5.3K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
5.3K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.9K
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

11.7K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
11.7K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

494
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
494
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.2K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

43.2K

An improved closed procedure for testing multiple hypotheses.

Zeng-Hua Lu1

  • 1University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Statistics in Medicine
|July 25, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an enhanced closed testing procedure (CTP) for clinical trials, improving the power to detect false hypotheses while maintaining familywise error rate control. The new method offers superior statistical power for multiple hypothesis testing in research.

Keywords:
closure methodconsonancedissonancefamilywise error ratemultiple hypothesis testing

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1000

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

43.2K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1000

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Clinical trials frequently employ multiple hypothesis testing, necessitating robust statistical methods.
  • The closed testing procedure (CTP) is a standard framework for controlling familywise error rates in such scenarios.
  • Existing CTP methods may lack optimal power in detecting true effects when multiple hypotheses are tested.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an improved closed testing procedure (CTP) that enhances statistical power.
  • To demonstrate that the proposed CTP allows testing intersection hypotheses at a higher level while preserving familywise error rate control.
  • To show the practical applicability and power improvements of the enhanced CTP across various statistical tests.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel closed testing procedure (CTP) algorithm.
  • Theoretical analysis of the proposed CTP's properties regarding familywise error rate control.
  • Comparative power analysis against the original CTP for common statistical tests.
  • Empirical validation using data from a glucose-lowering drug trial.

Main Results:

  • The improved CTP uniformly enhances the power to detect false hypotheses compared to the original CTP.
  • The method allows for testing intersection hypotheses at a level greater than alpha () while maintaining the overall familywise error rate at alpha ().
  • Demonstrated power improvements across several commonly utilized statistical tests in hypothesis testing.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed enhanced closed testing procedure offers a statistically superior approach for multiple hypothesis testing in clinical trials.
  • This method provides increased power for discovering true effects without compromising the integrity of error rate control.
  • The improved CTP is broadly applicable and offers significant advantages in the design and analysis of clinical research.