Development, Evaluation, and Pharmacokinetic Assessment of Polymeric Microarray Patches for Transdermal Delivery of

Delly Ramadon1,2, Andi Dian Permana1,3, Aaron J Courtenay1,4

  • 1School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, United Kingdom.

Insights

This study demonstrates successful transdermal delivery of vancomycin hydrochloride (VCL) using dissolving microarray patches (DMAPs) and hydrogel-forming microarray patches (HFMAPs) for treating Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Drug Delivery Systems

Background:

  • Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections necessitate effective treatments.
  • Vancomycin hydrochloride (VCL) is a primary antibiotic for MRSA but faces challenges with oral absorption and requires intravenous administration.
  • Intravenous delivery presents drawbacks, prompting investigation into alternative drug delivery methods like transdermal patches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate novel dissolving microarray patches (DMAPs) and hydrogel-forming microarray patches (HFMAPs) for transdermal delivery of vancomycin hydrochloride (VCL).
  • To assess the efficacy of VCL-loaded DMAPs and HFMAPs in delivering the drug across neonatal porcine skin and achieving therapeutic plasma concentrations in vivo.
  • To compare the transdermal delivery performance of DMAPs and HFMAPs against oral administration for VCL.

Main Methods:

  • Formulation of VCL into DMAPs and reservoir systems (film dosage forms, lyophilized wafers, compressed tablets) using various excipients.
  • Fabrication of HFMAPs using poly(methylvinyl ether-co-maleic acid) cross-linked with poly(ethylene glycol).
  • Ex vivo permeation studies across neonatal porcine skin and in vivo pharmacokinetic studies in animal models.

Main Results:

  • VCL-loaded compressed tablets (CSTs) were identified as optimal reservoirs for HFMAPs.
  • Ex vivo studies showed VCL permeation of 46.39 ± 8.04% with HFMAPs and 7.99 ± 0.98% with DMAPs.
  • In vivo studies demonstrated significantly higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0–∞) for HFMAPs (162.04 ± 61.84 μg h/mL) compared to oral administration (30.50 ± 9.18 μg h/mL).

Conclusions:

  • Transdermal delivery of VCL is feasible using both DMAPs and HFMAPs.
  • HFMAPs demonstrate superior transdermal delivery efficiency compared to DMAPs and oral administration.
  • This novel approach holds potential for treating MRSA infections, including skin and soft tissue infections, lymphatic-related infections, and neonatal sepsis.