Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Technical Refinement of a Bilateral Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Mouse Model for Acute Kidney Injury Research
Published on: November 3, 2023
Adherence to guidelines is associated with improved survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest
Fredrik Hessulf1, Johan Herlitz2, Araz Rawshani3
1Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Halland Hospital, SE-301 85 Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institution of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Insights
Adhering to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines after in-hospital cardiac arrest significantly improves survival rates and neurological function for patients with both shockable and non-shockable rhythms. Strict adherence to CPR protocols is crucial for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Resuscitation guidelines often specify maximum delay times for critical interventions following cardiac arrest.
- In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) survival rates are influenced by the timeliness and adherence to established treatment protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between adherence to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines and patient survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).
- To specifically examine the impact of delays in treatment initiation on outcomes in IHCA patients.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Swedish Registry for CPR, analyzing data from 3212 patients with shockable rhythms and 9113 with non-shockable rhythms (2008-2017).
- Included adult patients (≥18 years) with witnessed IHCA where resuscitation was initiated.
- Defined adherence based on time to calling for help, CPR initiation (within 1 min), and defibrillation (within 3 min for shockable rhythms).
Main Results:
- For shockable rhythms, 30-day survival was 66.1% with guideline adherence versus 46.5% without (aOR 1.84).
- For non-shockable rhythms, 30-day survival was 22.8% with adherence versus 16.0% without (aOR 1.43).
- Improved neurological function was observed in survivors treated according to guidelines for both rhythm types.
Conclusions:
- Adherence to CPR guidelines is significantly associated with increased survival probability and better neurological outcomes in IHCA patients.
- Enhancing adherence to established CPR protocols holds the potential to improve overall cardiac arrest survival rates.
Background:
Most resuscitation guidelines have recommendations regarding maximum delay times from collapse to calling for the rescue team and initiation of treatment following cardiac arrest. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between adherence to guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and survival with a focus on delay to treatment.
Methods:
We used the Swedish Registry for CPR to study 3212 patients with a shockable rhythm and 9113 patients with non-shockable rhythm from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2017. Adult patients older than or equal to 18 years with a witnessed IHCA where resuscitation was initiated were included. We assessed trends in adherence to guidelines and their associations with 30-day survival and neurological function. Adherence to guidelines was defined as follows: time from collapse to calling for the rescue team and CPR within 1 min for non-shockable rhythms. For shockable rhythms, adherence was defined as the time from collapse to calling for the rescue team and CPR within 1 min and defibrillation within 3 min.
Results:
In patients with a shockable rhythm, the 30-day survival for those treated according to guidelines was 66.1%, as compared to 46.5% among those not treated according to guidelines on one or more parameters, adjusted odds ratio 1.84 (95% CI 1.52-2.22). Among patients with a non-shockable rhythm the 30-day survival for those treated according to guidelines was 22.8%, as compared to 16.0% among those not treated according to guidelines on one or more parameters, adjusted odds ratio 1.43 (95% CI 1.24-1.65). Neurological function (cerebral performance category 1-2) among survivors was better among patients treated in accordance with guidelines for both shockable (95.7% vs 91.1%, <0.001) and non-shockable rhythms (91.0% vs 85.5%, p < 0.008). Adherence to the Swedish guidelines for CPR increased slightly 2008-2017.
Conclusions:
Adherence to guidelines was associated with increased probability of survival and improved neurological function in patients with a shockable and non-shockable rhythm, respectively. Increased adherence to guidelines could increase cardiac arrest survival.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

