Differential effects of mind-wandering and visual distraction on age-related changes in neuro-electric brain activity...

Optimal performance in many tasks requires minimizing the impact of both visual distractors in the environment and distracting internal thoughts (i.e., mind-wandering). Prior research has indicated that older adults are disproportionately affected by the presence of visual distractors compared to young adults, but are not excessively affected by distracting thoughts. Yet an explanation for these dissociable effects remains elusive. In the current study, we assessed age-related differences in event-related potentials and neural variability associated with internal distraction and visual distractors in a go/no-go task. Compared to young adults, older adults showed an increased visual distraction cost in mean reaction time (RT) and RT variability but a reduction in internal distraction frequency and a reduced internal distraction cost on go accuracy and RT variability. Visual distraction and internal distraction were associated with opposite patterns of behavioral and neural effects. Behaviorally, across age groups, internal distraction was associated with more no-go errors whereas visual distraction was associated with reduced no-go errors. Across groups, internal distraction was associated with decreased P3 amplitude, whereas visual distraction was associated with increased P3 amplitude. In addition, internal distraction was associated with an increase in neural variability (more so in young versus older adults), while visual distraction was associated with a reduction in variability in young adults only. We suggest that the opposing effects of the two distractor types on behavioral and neural measures occur because visual distraction is associated with increased attentional resources devoted to the task to overcome visual interference whereas internal distraction is associated with decreased attentional resources devoted to the task. Moreover, older adults exhibited reduced flexibility of neural variability as a function of both distractor types, which may correspond to a diminished ability to up-regulate attention in the face of visual distraction and a diminished shift in attention away from the task during internal distraction.