Discrepancy between MRA and DSA in identifying the shape of small intracranial aneurysms

Youngseok Kwak1, Wonsoo Son2, Yong-Sun Kim3

  • 11Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu; and.

Abstract

Insights

Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) shows low sensitivity in detecting irregular shapes of small intracranial aneurysms. Anterior cerebral artery location, small size (<3mm), and 1.5T strength increase the risk of misclassification.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Small unruptured intracranial aneurysms pose a diagnostic challenge.
  • Accurate morphological assessment is crucial for rupture risk stratification.
  • Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) is the current gold standard for aneurysm shape analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the sensitivity and accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) in identifying the shape of small unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
  • To determine factors influencing MRA's performance in shape detection.

Main Methods:

  • Morphological review of 652 small (<7mm) unruptured intracranial aneurysms (initially detected by MRA, confirmed by DSA).
  • Two independent neuroradiologists assessed aneurysm shape regularity using MRA, with DSA as the reference standard.
  • Analysis of MRA sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy based on aneurysm location, size, and MRA magnetic strength (1.5T vs 3T).

Main Results:

  • Overall MRA sensitivity for detecting irregular aneurysm shape was approximately 60%.
  • Lowest sensitivity was observed for anterior cerebral artery aneurysms and aneurysms < 3 mm.
  • 1.5T MRA demonstrated lower sensitivity and accuracy compared to 3T MRA.
  • Multivariate analysis identified location, size, and MRA magnetic strength as independent risk factors for false-negative results.

Conclusions:

  • MRA has limited sensitivity in detecting the irregular shape of small intracranial aneurysms.
  • Anterior cerebral artery location, aneurysm size < 3 mm, and 1.5T MRA are associated with a higher risk of misclassifying irregular aneurysms as regular.
  • These findings highlight the need for careful interpretation of MRA in evaluating small intracranial aneurysms.