Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
Multivessel PCI for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Where Do We Stand After The COMPLETE Trial?
Islam Y Elgendy1, Dhruv Mahtta2, David Paniagua3
1Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar. iyelgendy@gmail.com.
Insights
Complete revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients without cardiogenic shock reduces major adverse cardiac events, primarily myocardial infarction. This strategy, performed during hospitalization or after discharge, improves outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Multivessel coronary artery disease is common in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Previous trials suggested complete revascularization benefits STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock, mainly by reducing revascularization needs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of complete revascularization on outcomes in STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock.
- To determine if complete revascularization reduces cardiac mortality or myocardial infarction (MI) compared to culprit-only revascularization.
Main Methods:
- The study analyzed data from the COMPLETE trial.
- It compared complete revascularization (addressing all non-culprit stenoses) versus culprit-only revascularization in STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock.
- Revascularization was performed during index hospitalization or after discharge.
Main Results:
- Complete revascularization significantly reduced the risk of cardiac mortality or MI at a median of 3 years.
- The benefit was driven by a reduction in MI risk.
- No significant difference in cardiac mortality was observed.
Conclusions:
- Complete revascularization of non-culprit lesions in STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock improves outcomes.
- This strategy should be considered the default approach when feasible.
- It reduces the risk of future myocardial infarction.
Purpose Of Review:
Multivessel coronary artery disease is frequently encountered in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Several moderate-sized randomized trials have suggested that complete revascularization of non-culprit stenoses in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients without cardiogenic shock is associated with improved outcomes driven solely by a reduction in the risk of future revascularization.
Recent Findings:
The Complete versus Culprit-only Revascularization to Treat Multi-vessel disease after Early PCI for STEMI (COMPLETE) trial recently showed that a complete revascularization strategy for non-culprit stenoses for STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock, performed either during the index hospitalization or after discharge, reduces the risk of cardiac mortality or myocardial infarction (MI) driven by a reduction in the risk of MI at a median of 3 years. In STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock undergoing primary PCI, a complete revascularization strategy for non-culprit stenoses, performed either during the index hospitalization or shortly after discharge, improves outcomes and should be considered as the default strategy whenever feasible.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
10:01Improvement of a Closed Chest Porcine Myocardial Infarction Model by Standardization of Tissue and Blood Sampling Procedures
Published on: March 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care