A systematic review on brain injury and altered brain development in moderate-late preterm infants

Vivian Boswinkel1, Jacqueline Nijboer-Oosterveld2, Ingrid M Nijholt2

  • 1Department of Neonatology, Isala Women and Children's hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Insights

Moderate-late preterm infants show varied rates of brain injury, including intraventricular hemorrhage and white matter injury. Evidence comparing these rates to very preterm or term infants is limited due to study quality.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal neurology
  • Developmental neuroscience
  • Pediatric neuroimaging

Background:

  • Moderate-late preterm (MLPT) infants represent a distinct group with potential for unique neurodevelopmental outcomes.
  • Understanding brain injury and development in MLPT infants is crucial for optimizing long-term health.
  • Comparisons with very preterm and term infants provide essential benchmarks for assessing MLPT neurodevelopment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review brain injury and altered brain development in MLPT infants.
  • To compare findings in MLPT infants with those in very preterm and term infants.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic search of five databases (January 2020) for original research.
  • Inclusion of studies on brain injury incidence and quantitative brain development data in MLPT infants.
  • Quality appraisal using the Johanna Briggs Institute checklist; data extraction on imaging, injury incidence, and brain development metrics.

Main Results:

  • Twenty-four studies were eligible, mostly of moderate quality.
  • Incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in MLPT infants ranged from 0.0% to 23.5%; white matter injury (WMI) ranged from 0.5% to 10.8%.
  • Limited evidence suggests potential differences in brain development between MLPT and term infants, with weak comparative data on brain injury incidence.

Conclusions:

  • Incidences of IVH and WMI in MLPT infants exhibit wide variation.
  • Methodological limitations in current studies weaken conclusions regarding comparative brain injury rates.
  • Further high-quality research is needed to clarify brain development and injury risks in MLPT infants.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos