Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

07:40
Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations
Published on: October 29, 2016
11.4K
The Uptick in Income Segregation: Real Trend or Random Sampling Variation?
John R Logan1, Andrew Foster1, Jun Ke1
1Brown University.
AJS; American Journal of Sociology
|July 28, 2020
Summary
Income segregation in US metropolitan areas may appear to be increasing due to smaller sample sizes in the American Community Survey (ACS). This study proposes bias correction methods for more accurate segregation trend analysis.
Area of Science:
- Sociology
- Urban Studies
- Demography
Background:
- Recent studies indicate a reversal in income segregation trends in U.S. metropolitan regions, shifting from decline to increase.
- This trend aligns with growing concerns about U.S. income inequality since the 1970s.
- However, evidence may be biased due to smaller American Community Survey (ACS) sample sizes compared to Census 2000.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of varying sampling rates on income segregation estimates.
- To propose and test bias-correction methods for segregation measures.
- To provide more accurate insights into U.S. income segregation trends.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 100% microdata from the 1940 census to simulate sampling rate impacts.
- Developed and tested bias-correction approaches for segregation measures.
- Applied correction methods to U.S. Census 2000 and American Community Survey (ACS) data (2007-2011).
Main Results:
- Reduced sample sizes in the ACS exaggerate the evidence of increasing income segregation.
- This exaggeration is particularly pronounced for specific subgroups, such as African Americans.
- Tested bias-correction methods showed potential for yielding more conclusive and unbiased results.
Conclusions:
- The apparent rise in income segregation may be partly an artifact of sampling biases in the ACS.
- Bias-correction techniques are crucial for accurate analysis of segregation trends.
- Further application of these methods to internal Census Bureau data is recommended for definitive findings.
Related Concept Videos
Stratified Sampling Method
14.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
14.3K
Random Sampling Method
13.9K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
13.9K
Cluster Sampling Method
13.8K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
13.8K
Sampling Plans
780
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
780
Randomized Experiments
8.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.7K
Segregation in Fresh Concrete
435
Segregation in fresh concrete is a phenomenon where the components of the concrete mix separate, leading to uneven distribution and compromised structural integrity. This separation typically occurs when concrete is subjected to excessive horizontal movement within forms, or when it is dropped from considerable heights or forced through narrow, winding paths. As a result, heavier coarse aggregate particles settle at the bottom, while lighter, finer materials such as cement and water rise to the...
435

