Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pelvic Exenteration in Primary Colorectal Cancer
Naveena An Kumar1, Sajith P Sasi2, Rajesh S Shinde2
1Department of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Care Center, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education.
Background:
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for pelvic exenteration is not a well-established technique. The aim was to assess the safety and feasibility of MIS for pelvic exenteration in locally advanced primary colorectal cancer and to compare the perioperative outcomes with open surgery.
Methods:
This is a retrospective analysis of patients, who had undergone pelvic exenteration for primary colorectal adenocarcinoma from May 2013 to July 2018. The short-term outcomes like perioperative details and histopathological characteristics were compared between the two groups.
Results:
MIS was performed in 23 patients and open pelvic exenteration was carried out in 72 patients. The mean operative time was significantly more in the MIS group (640 vs. 432 min, p = 0.00). The intraoperative blood loss (900 vs. 1550 ml, p = 0.00) and the requirement for blood transfusion (170 vs. 250 ml, p = 0.03) was significantly less in the MIS group. The overall morbidity (60% vs. 49%, p = 0.306) was comparable between the two groups. The median length of hospital stay in the MIS group was 11 d, compared to 12 d in the open surgery group, (p = 0.634). The rate of R0 resection (87% vs. 89%, p = 0.668) was comparable between the two groups.
Conclusion:
MIS is feasible and safe for total pelvic exenteration and posterior exenteration in carefully selected locally advanced primary colorectal cancer, when performed by an experienced surgical team in high volume centers. An R0 resection with adequate margin can be achieved with good perioperative outcomes in MIS. Long-term oncological outcomes would require further follow up to confirm.
Insights
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for pelvic exenteration is safe and feasible for locally advanced colorectal cancer. This approach offers reduced blood loss and transfusion needs compared to open surgery, with comparable outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Colorectal Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Procedures
Background:
- Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for pelvic exenteration is an emerging technique.
- Locally advanced primary colorectal cancer presents surgical challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and feasibility of MIS for pelvic exenteration.
- To compare perioperative outcomes of MIS versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for colorectal adenocarcinoma (May 2013 - July 2018).
- Comparison of short-term outcomes, including perioperative details and histopathological characteristics, between MIS and open surgery groups.
Main Results:
- MIS group (23 patients) had longer operative time (640 vs. 432 min) but significantly less blood loss (900 vs. 1550 ml) and transfusion requirement (170 vs. 250 ml).
- Overall morbidity (60% vs. 49%) and median hospital stay (11 vs. 12 days) were comparable between MIS and open surgery.
- R0 resection rates were similar (87% vs. 89%) between the groups.
Conclusions:
- MIS is a feasible and safe option for pelvic exenteration in selected patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer.
- High-volume centers and experienced surgical teams are crucial for successful MIS outcomes.
- MIS achieves adequate margins (R0 resection) with favorable perioperative results, though long-term oncological outcomes require further investigation.
More Related Videos
12:45Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
07:22Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
Published on: June 13, 2025